You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Economy
Author blames airline industry mergers for dodgy customer service
2017-04-12
[Buzzfeed] If you've ever wondered why airlines in the US seem so terrible, from the cramped seats to the constant delays and the inexplicably bad responses to their customers being roughed up by goons, this graphic might help you understand the situation a little better.

Over the last decade or so, 11 big US domestic airlines have shrunk down to five extremely big ones, in a frenzy of takeovers and mergers. With less competition to worry about, airlines are now doing exactly what you'd expect them to do: spend less time worrying about how to keep their customers happy, and more time working out how to make more money.

It's not rocket science, and it's the same reason your cable company's customer service sucks so much. What are you going to to about it?

(It's also the same reason why restaurants tend to treat you pretty well.)

A few years back, inspectors at the Department of Transportation tried to figure out exactly how connected competition is to good airline service. They studied the delayed flights over a seven-year period beginning in 2005, and checked to see if delays increased as competition between airlines decreased.

The results look pretty much exactly like you expect they would. Here's a graph of the average delay time across all flights, and how it changes as competition goes from intense, on the left, to nonexistent, on the right -- things get rapidly worse as competition thins away, and then remain at a baseline level of terrible as the market moves toward a monopoly.

Posted by:Besoeker

#6  rjschwarz - There is one company (that I can think o)f that did go this route. It's called NetJets but it probably too pricey for the average bear.
Posted by: warthogswife   2017-04-12 16:49  

#5  Back in the 90s I read an article in Popular Science about the coming revolution in Air Travel. New navigation and fly by wire techniques were going to create a new generation of cheaper small planes that would allow direct flights between small airports instead of the hub system. Instead of planes acting like buses they would be more like limo-buses or limos. They mentioned that instead of buying tickets folks could be buying a time-share in a plane. Sounded pretty good.

I assume the tech didn't pay out or Sept 11 screwed it up (feds not wanting tons of little planes flying everywhere).
Posted by: rjschwarz   2017-04-12 11:30  

#4  Eh, I flew a lot in the 1980s and the experience was pretty awful back then as well. From the moment airlines decided to be the Greyhound of the Skies it was destined to be a less than awesome experience.

The Concierge Airlines idea might actually be a good one as an alternative for those willing to pay for the privilege of being treated well and provided on-time flight service.
Posted by: Crusader   2017-04-12 10:50  

#3  In other words:

"We don't care! We don't have to! We're the phone compay airlines!"
Posted by: CrazyFool   2017-04-12 09:34  

#2  Is this anyway to run a bus company? As long as people are willing to be treated as cattle, it makes my driving easier on the interstate, except I75 in Florida which always seems to be like a WWII bomber formation from I10 to the Turnpike.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-04-12 09:32  

#1  Why I hate to fly. The airlines and their govmint overlords have ruined the airline industry for passengers. High-priced tickets and expensive add-on services to only be abused with herding mentality, oversold seats and often surly TSA screeners. It seems like there would be a good market for a private airline that circumvented all the BS, was secure and treated passengers with a little respect. It could be called Concierge Airlines.
Posted by: JohnQC   2017-04-12 09:15  

00:00