Submit your comments on this article |
-Lurid Crime Tales- |
GOP adopts Rantburg Border Wall funding solution |
2017-03-31 |
Estimates vary, but remittances from those in the U.S. to their relatives back home could top $130 billion a year. A 2 percent tax could net more than $2 billion a year, if it applied to all money regardless of who’s sending it. "This bill is simple ‐ anyone who sends their money to countries that benefit from our porous borders and illegal immigration should be responsible for providing some of the funds needed to complete the wall," Rep. Mike Rogers, Alabama Republican, said in a statement. "This bill keeps money in the American economy, and most importantly, it creates a funding stream to build the wall." Mr. Rogers and Rep. Lou Barletta of Pennsylvania are leading the effort. Mr. Trump has vowed to make Mexico foot the bill for his border wall, but Mexican authorities have said they won’t play along. Left without a funding source, the president has said American taxpayers will pick up the tab for now, and he’ll look for ways to soak Mexico in the long run. |
Posted by:Besoeker |
#10 Good idea, but not likely to happen. Trump probably agreed to not tax remittances in this meeting with Carlos Slim. Shortly after this meeting the Mexican President met up with candidate Trump for a photo op. |
Posted by: rammer 2017-03-31 17:26 |
#9 The entire illegal immigration inundation actually began when the USBP had use of lethal force ROE significantly changed under Reagan and it turned into no-flag tackle football. From then on, it was a numbers game and quickly all the strategies to overwhelm the BP sectors with diversionary tactics were refined. |
Posted by: NoMoreBS 2017-03-31 17:17 |
#8 Not a sale of hunting licenses - just permission for use of official force when called for. The check-off box would be like the one they have for political donations, but dedicated to border enforcement. |
Posted by: Glenmore 2017-03-31 16:08 |
#7 Sounds like Glenmore is suggesting the sale of hunting licences. While I don't endorse that sort of thing the rumor alone would probably stop a lot of the border incursions. |
Posted by: rjschwarz 2017-03-31 13:53 |
#6 My brother said not to bother with the wall: messing with their money would be incentive enough. He thought 20% would be appropriate. Posted by Ptah Yes, at 20% they might just build the wall themselves. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2017-03-31 12:47 |
#5 Will this bill include H1B visa holders? That'd be cool. |
Posted by: Abu Uluque 2017-03-31 12:23 |
#4 My brother said not to bother with the wall: messing with their money would be incentive enough. He thought 20% would be appropriate. |
Posted by: Ptah 2017-03-31 11:54 |
#3 The transgressors don't pay income tax, GM. |
Posted by: Skidmark 2017-03-31 11:32 |
#2 How about funding it with a check-off box on income tax return? If it comes with RoE that permit deadly force I'd go for it. |
Posted by: Glenmore 2017-03-31 10:55 |
#1 Why don't we hear Western Union squealing yet? Think the Mexicans will develop Sharia banking? |
Posted by: Skidmark 2017-03-31 07:43 |