| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Land of the Free |
| Anti-Gun Researchers Admit To Including Injuries From Non-Gun Objects In |
| 2017-03-30 |
| A study published in the Canadian Medical Association Journal claimed one child or youth is injured by a firearm daily in Ontario alone. The problem? The study isn’t exactly accurate. Put simply, the study authors included injuries caused by objects not classified by Canadian law as firearms – namely, air guns. The authors also defined “youth” as anyone shy of 25 years old. |
| Posted by:DarthVader |
| #7 un arma Ouch. Masculine weapon, feminine hen? |
| Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220 2017-03-30 23:51 |
| #6 An ungallant gallo gallego Turned puro gallina (and preggo!). Who worked this milagro? His soon-to-be suegro, By waving un arma de fuego. |
| Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220 2017-03-30 23:49 |
| #5 Well yea, if your arm is on fire, injuries is to be expected! |
| Posted by: Seeking cure for ignorance 2017-03-30 23:12 |
| #4 If you have to lie here, you're wrong. |
| Posted by: gorb 2017-03-30 21:22 |
| #3 In ancient times they had no statistics so they had to fall back on lies. Things have not changed much since ancient times; today statistics are used to lie and push a lefty agenda and cloak it with junk science. |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2017-03-30 18:58 |
| #2 Did the study include sticks that look like firearms? |
| Posted by: Deacon Blues 2017-03-30 16:36 |
| #1 defined “youth” as anyone shy of 25 years old. So Canadians mature a year younger than Americans, who are still children on their parents health insurance until age 26. |
| Posted by: Glenmore 2017-03-30 12:33 |