You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Why Corporate Leaders Became Progressive Activists
2017-03-15
h/t Instapundit
[NationalReview] The Organization Man, whom we first met in 1956, is still very much with us. And his eccentric career since that time partly answers a question that mystifies many contemporary conservatives: Given that progressives profess to hate corporations, why are our corporate leaders so progressive? It is easy to understand their taking a self-interested stand against the Trump administration over things such as the H-1B program and visa waivers, which interfere with their access to workers and customers, respectively. But 130 corporate leaders -- including the CEOs of American Airlines and Bank of America -- getting together to come down on North Carolina over public-bathroom rules that annoy transgender activists? Together with business leaders who have no presence in North Carolina and nothing to do with the state or its politics?

Is it only cravenness -- or something more?
Long but informative. IMO, People on top, don't really like vertical mobility
Posted by:g(r)omgoru

#6  #4

something along the lines of the Homestead Strike, then setting up a front to make indulgences 'donation' to buy your soul back.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2017-03-15 23:53  

#5  #4 It's called buying salvation.

Exactly, or at least immortality via encomia from hackademics for their titanic progressivism.

And maybe even a statue-- or at least a plaque!
Posted by: charger   2017-03-15 19:49  

#4  It's called buying salvation.
Posted by: ed in texas   2017-03-15 19:28  

#3  Oh, so I get it! Corporations really are evil.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2017-03-15 12:36  

#2  OPM. Other People's Money. It is easy to enjoy the selfish glow of faux virtue when you can donate money that belongs to others. The shareholder don't need their dividends when it is for the children (but your golden parachute has to sparkle!)
Posted by: magpie   2017-03-15 10:12  

#1  I thought it was to have the government protect their ass...ets.
Posted by: Bobby   2017-03-15 07:21  

00:00