Submit your comments on this article |
Home Front: Politix |
Study Find Losers Fall for Media Hoaxes |
2017-03-03 |
![]() A new study shows that an increasing amount of Democrats are likely to embrace conspiracy theories in the media after losing the 2016 election. You could've knocked me over with a feather! The study, entitled "Conspiracy Endorsement as Motivated Reasoning: The Moderating Roles of Political Knowledge and Trust," compares how Republicans and Democrats changed their responses to a conspiracy predispositions scale. Conspiracy statements at link The percentage of Democrats who agreed on average with a conspiracy claim increased from 27 percent before the 2016 election to 32 percent after President Donald Trump won. But Republicans' inclination to embrace a conspiratorial claim overall declined in three of the four statements. The amount of Republicans who agreed on average with conspiratorial statements decreased from 28 percent before the election to 19 percent afterwards. One in three Dems are dim, compared with only one in five trunks. The managing editor of Snopes told The Atlantic in February that since Trump's election, more conspiratorial stories have risen aimed at liberals. "Yes, there has been more coming from the left. A lot of dubious news, a lot of wishful thinking type stuff." Since the 2016 election, idea-based articles have swept the internet. Including gobs of Russian conspiracy froth. |
Posted by:Bobby |
#16 The playwright, reduce-and-reuser: "Just Hitler, conducting a newser." Enthused the producer, "A mortal lock looser!" "A coup, sir. A guaranteed snoozer." Feh... gut nuthin. |
Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220 2017-03-03 19:32 |
#15 There, girths grow too great to be girt But billow from under their shirt. Like locusts on honey (but focused on money) They're blundering through the dessert. DC? Dunno. |
Posted by: Zenobia Floger6220 2017-03-03 19:12 |
#14 R-burg's resident poet(s) casn take a crack at this. Maybe they can put together something with looser and loser. Rhyming words might be: user, abuser, boozer, lose her, choosers, cruiser, end users, accusers, drug abuser, oozer, schmoozer, … |
Posted by: JohnQC 2017-03-03 19:09 |
#13 Its a crying shame too have done that, tw. In it's own way, it was... well, it was. |
Posted by: Pappy 2017-03-03 17:58 |
#12 I couldn't stand it. Title typo fixed, while acknowledging that the discussion is utterly delightful, in an extremely painful kind of way. Carry on. |
Posted by: trailing wife 2017-03-03 16:05 |
#11 Your absolutely correct, Alan. |
Posted by: Pappy 2017-03-03 15:37 |
#10 But Frank, are those dry deserts or are they cold deserts or salty deserts? Of course any of those would be a just dessert for those loosers, know? |
Posted by: AlanC 2017-03-03 13:26 |
#9 Or losells, if you use 16th century spelling... |
Posted by: Pappy 2017-03-03 13:24 |
#8 losels |
Posted by: 3dc 2017-03-03 12:37 |
#7 Losers or losels? |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2017-03-03 11:54 |
#6 How liberal! Focus on the typographical error, not the content! |
Posted by: Bobby 2017-03-03 11:22 |
#5 "Loosers" instead of "Losers" bugs me |
Posted by: Frank G 2017-03-03 11:08 |
#4 Most unhinged people fall for these. Yes, not a surprise. |
Posted by: DarthVader 2017-03-03 09:47 |
#3 Herb, the laughing fits we experience whilst pointing at lib-progs, loosens our loins and we lose our concentration. |
Posted by: AlmostAnonymous5839 2017-03-03 09:38 |
#2 How loose did they get? They get so loose they fall off? Oh, lose? They're losers? Geez it makes our side look like the morons they say we are when we can't even speak our own language correctly. |
Posted by: Herb McCoy7309 2017-03-03 09:09 |
#1 There has to be faultfinding and someone to blame. Democrats can never face the fact that they had nothing to sell and |
Posted by: JohnQC 2017-03-03 08:43 |