Submit your comments on this article | |
Home Front: Politix | |
New York Times executive editor: 'New York is not the real world' | |
2016-11-11 | |
![]() ...which still proudly displays Walter Duranty's Pulitzer prize... Executive Editor Dean Baquet said his newspaper's insular world view is at fault for so wrongly misreading the election that saw Donald Trump ...New York real estate developer, described by Dems as illiterate, racist, misogynistic, and what ever other unpleasant descriptions they can think of, elected by the rest of us as 45th President of the United States... become the president-elect. In an interview with Times media columnist Jim Rutenberg, Baquet said he and his publication on the lam did not see Trump's coming success on Election Day because they do not understand much of the country's voters. "If I have a mea culpa for journalists and journalism, it's that we've got to do a much better job of being on the road, out in the country, talking to different kinds of people than the people we talk to -- especially if you happen to be a New York-based news organization -- and remind ourselves that New York is not the real world," he said. Baquet's apologia was a refrain of what many journalists and news hounds have said since it was clear that Trump would likely win the nomination in the early months of 2016. But even up until Election Day, most news outlets predicted a win for Clinton.
| |
Posted by:Fred |
#7 tightly packed Urbanites are the group most missing the mark on America..... they live for their own orgasms and self gratification. Country Folk ( that basket of deplorables ), on the other had, help each other, understand that unbridled greed is a "bad" thing, and that ones immediate gratification comes from charity and selflessness. |
Posted by: 746 2016-11-11 12:23 |
#6 They always trot out these think pieces when the Dems do badly. And then promptly forget the lessons "learned" in the next election cycle. |
Posted by: charger 2016-11-11 11:38 |
#5 California is not the real world either. |
Posted by: rjschwarz 2016-11-11 11:13 |
#4 I still like the remark about the NYT being a Manhattan local rag owned by a Mexican billionaire. |
Posted by: Pappy 2016-11-11 11:09 |
#3 Steve, the Times DOES speak for evert 'enlightened' citizen of the country. Kind of by definition - if they read the Times, they're 'enlightened.' |
Posted by: Glenmore 2016-11-11 09:57 |
#2 If the NYT had openly admitted that they were the newspaper of record for Midtown, no one would mind. The advertisers looking and paying for a larger (re: national) market would mind when paying the freight for that service. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2016-11-11 09:09 |
#1 Maybe they should just stick to crossword puzzles |
Posted by: Cheaderhead 2016-11-11 05:54 |