You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Obama to veto Saudi 9/11 prosecution
2016-09-24
[ENGLISH.ALARABIYA.NET] Barack Obama
I mean, I do think at a certain point you've made enough money...
will on Friday veto legislation allowing 9/11 victims to sue Soddy Arabia
...a kingdom taking up the bulk of the Arabian peninsula. Its primary economic activity involves exporting oil and soaking Islamic rubes on the annual hajj pilgrimage. The country supports a large number of princes in whatcha might call princely splendor. When the oil runs out the rest of the world is going to kick sand in the Soddy national face...
, risking public outrage and the first congressional override of his presidency.

The White House confirmed Thursday that Obama would veto the legislation ‐ unanimously passed by Congress ‐ allowing 9/11 families to launch civil suits against Riyadh.

"We believe this is a bad bill," said White House front man Josh Earnest. "It’s why the president’s going to veto it."

The White House argues the legislation would undermine sovereign immunity and potentially expose US officials and service members to litigation.

Obama has issued 11 vetoes so far in his presidency, none of which have garnered the two-thirds opposition needed for an override.
That's two thirds of members of each House. Impossible to achieve in the Senate without the help of Democrats, who have been remarkably disciplined.
Update from The Times of Israel at 2:20 p.m. ET: He vetoed it.
US President Barack Obama rejected a bill Friday that would have allowed the families of 9/11 victims to sue the government of Saudi Arabia, arguing it undermined national security and setting up the possibility Congress may override his veto for the first time in his presidency.

The president said the bill, which doesn’t refer specifically to Saudi Arabia, could backfire by opening up the US government and its officials to lawsuits by anyone accusing the US of supporting terrorism, rightly or wrongly.
Posted by:Fred

#5  And if it reflects back, somehow, stretching reality, on the USA, screw them.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike   2016-09-24 21:19  

#4  I understand newc's reticince, but BRING IT MOFO's.
Past time to be civil.
Past time to treat the Saudi's as anything less than treachers.
Kill them in the court of public opinion.
What are they going to do, STOP SELLING OIL?
They are a cancer on the world corpus.
Screw them.
Posted by: Whiskey Mike   2016-09-24 21:17  

#3  Self-preservation
Posted by: Thor Lumumba3940   2016-09-24 09:31  

#2  I hate to say this, but I also do not want this bill passed. I forgot some doctrine and was pushing for it.

It's just not going to work any better for US. I will look for the writeup.
Posted by: newc   2016-09-24 01:46  

#1  Let's all watch and act surprised when the do-nothing and make-believe "opposition party" does not one damn thing to over-turn the veto.
Posted by: Crusader   2016-09-24 00:10  

00:00