#2 Alliance with Russia against the whole of Salafist Jihad makes perfect sense. India should be included in that alliance. With the exception of Poland and possibly Spain, Europe now accepts the Salafist Jihad, deliberately invited it in, so instead of protecting Europe, now Muslim, from Russia (still Christian), in that region USA should be protecting Russia from pincer movement coming from its west (Muslim Europe) and East (the Muslim 'stans), south (Turkey) and southeast (Iran).
http://theological-geography.net/?s=three+brothers
Trump is right, NATO is obsolete. Staying in NATO, USA is directly protecting Salafist Jihad that controls Europe, excepting Poland and perhaps Spain. Times have changed. American citizens themselves watch the D-R Uniparty dissolving the United States and attacking them personally by destroying their country's borders. This is why Trump, who doesn't need to, decided to offer in, to help save the country and protect her citizens. And it is why a movement-in-waiting immediately polymerized around his offer.
What's needed now is forging out the conceptual framework that expresses and helps concretizes in institutions and alliances the powers of history and being itself which are in evidence. Just in Europe alone, NATO, SACEUR, EUCOM and Bretton Woods need replacing and with the force vectors running pretty much the opposite direction from those created in the 1940s. Excepting Poland and maybe Spain, Europe is Salafist, an enemy now of Christian and Hindu civilizations. |
