You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Navy commander surrendered to Iran to protect Obama's nuclear deal
2016-07-01
[Wash Times] The Navy commander in charge of a pair of patrol boats captured by Iranian forces in January opted to surrender rather than fight back, citing later fears that a confrontation could endanger the Obama administration’s efforts to lock in a deal with Tehran on its nuclear program.

In an interview with investigators looking into the January incident, the commander said he surrendered the vessels after calculating that his sailors would not be in danger because Iran "wants this nuke deal to go through."

The interview was one of several stunning revelations in the often scathing 170-page report compiled by Navy investigators, chronicling the chain of events that led to the apprehension and detention of the 10 American sailors by the Iranian military after a pair of U.S. patrol boats drifted into the country’s sovereign waters in the Persian Gulf.

The incident, which played out as President Obama was preparing his State of the Union address, proved deeply embarrassing to the U.S. military and roiled diplomatic relations between Tehran and Washington as they were trying to implement key measures in the deal to curb Iran’s suspect nuclear programs.

Adm. John Richardson, chief of naval operations, said Thursday that the mishandling of the incident resulted from "the accumulation of a number of small problems" created by the U.S. sailors who strayed into Iranian waters all the way up to the senior commanders who led the Navy squadron and task force under which the unit served.
Posted by:Besoeker

#4  You mean like...traveling to China and putting on a Romulan costume?
Posted by: swksvolFF   2016-07-01 17:36  

#3  I'm surprised one of our enemies hasn't outright demanded Obama surrender just to see if he would.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2016-07-01 14:57  

#2  I don't think they've fixed blame on the enlisted - yet.

But a good leader still holds them accountable.
Posted by: Pappy   2016-07-01 08:50  

#1  Adm. John Richardson, chief of naval operations, said Thursday that the mishandling of the incident resulted from "the accumulation of a number of small problems" created by the U.S. sailors

Fixing blame on the enlisted men is generally the first indication of a much, much greater problem.
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-07-01 04:55  

00:00