- [DAILYMAIL.CO.UK] Psychologist, Dr Carol Nudelman, said she didn't evaluate Orlando shooter Omar Mateen for his position at security firm G4S in 2007
- However, her name appears on the document in Florida's state records that cleared him to carry a firearm as a private security guard
- G4S officials called the discrepancy a 'clerical error' and said Mateen had been evaluated, but by a different psychologist
- Company didn't move Mateen to unarmed position despite evidence that concluded comments he made were serious enough to transfer him
- 'What I do know is that in September 2007, I was not living or working in Florida, I was not performing any work for Wackenhut, and I did not administer any type of examination to Omar Mateen,' Nudelman said in the statement.
So it's a lazy Sunday and I have time to ask a whole bunch of questions:
- How many other evaluations did G4S fudge? Because it sure looks like they fudged this one.
- And did they let Omar go through because they didn't want to appear to be "Islamophobic"?
- Or did they have orders from DHS?
- Did they make up for it by doing extra-careful screening on all potential employees named "Bubba"?
- And hey, isn't this the same company moving illegal aliens around for DHS?
- Anyone think that DHS and the FBI are combing the G4S employment files right now looking at every OTHER security guard that was supposedly vetted by this doctor?
- And boy howdy, didn't the good doctor find a set of attorneys like real fast?
- Another question: parse the good doctor's statement carefully. She says she didn't evaluate Omar, but she DIDN'T say that she didn't sign the document. Did she?
- Oh, oh, oh, pick me -- did the doctor get paid for any "evaluations" after she left the firm? It would a little hard to explain a cancelled check, now wouldn't it?
- And for bonus points, was this documentation planted a while back by some organization on behalf of a "sleeper" agent?
|
|