| Submit your comments on this article |
| -Lurid Crime Tales- |
| Appears they missed one. Despite Clinton claims, 2012 email had classified marking |
| 2016-06-11 |
| [Fox] EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Clinton, from the moment her exclusive use of personal email for government business was exposed, has claimed nothing she sent or received was marked classified at the time. But a 2012 email released by the State Department appears to challenge that claim because it carries a classified code known as a "portion marking" - and that marking was on the email when it was sent directly to Clinton’s account. The "C" - which means it was marked classified at the confidential level - is in the left-hand-margin and relates to an April 2012 phone call with Malawi's first female president, Joyce Banda, who took power after the death of President Mutharika in 2012. "(C) Purpose of Call: to offer condolences on the passing of President Mukharika and congratulate President Banda on her recent swearing in." Everything after that was fully redacted before it was publicly released by the State Department -- a sign that the information was classified at the time and dealt with sensitive government deliberations. A US government source said there are other Clinton emails with classified markings, or marked classified, beyond the April 2012 document. |
| Posted by:Besoeker |
| #4 illustrates FIFY |
| Posted by: Mullah Richard 2016-06-11 15:22 |
| #3 So this lying POS candidate who has been in government all her life is claiming she knew nothing about government classification and security requirements? There's only one reason she had a personal server; she didn't want people to know what she was doing. |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2016-06-11 09:56 |
| #2 There are no 'classification markings' on information discussed over secure communications. There are no 'classification markings' on CHAT being conducted over secure network systems. Her continued insistence that documents devoid of security markings somehow makes her immune from violation, illustrates both her total ignorance and arrogance. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2016-06-11 07:27 |
| #1 Of course, that's all semantics/smoke and mirrors. As Bret Baier asked her the other day: The NDA that she signed says classified material doesn't HAVE TO be marked. By its nature and content, it's classified. She's guilty as sin and the fact she lies hourly about it makes her unfit |
| Posted by: Frank G 2016-06-11 07:08 |