You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
VFW blasts Obama for asserting members are confused by right-wing media
2016-06-03
[Wash Times] In attacking Donald Trump, President Obama has managed to anger one of the nation’s largest and oldest veterans’ groups.

The Veterans of Foreign Wars took offense at Mr. Obama’s assertion that its members are confused by right-wing media pundits.

"I don’t know how many VFW posts the president has ever visited," VFW National Commander John A. Biedrzycki Jr. said Thursday, "but our near 1.7 million members are a direct reflection of America, which means we represent every generation, race, religion, gender and political and ideological viewpoint."

He added, "We don’t have confused politics, we don’t need left- or right-wing media filters telling us how to think or vote, and we don’t need any president of the United States lecturing us about how we are individually effected by the economy."

During a speech Wednesday in Elkhart, Indiana Mr. Obama said, "I’m concerned when I watch the direction of our politics. I mean, we have been hearing this story for decades -- tales about welfare queens, talking about takers, talking about the 47 percent. It’s the story that’s broadcast every day on some cable news stations, on right-wing radio. It’s pumped into cars and bars and VFW halls all across America, and right here in Elkhart."

The president went on, "If you’re hearing that story all the time, you start believing it. It’s no wonder people think big government is the problem. No wonder public support for unions is so low. No wonder that people think the deficit has gone up under my presidency when it’s actually gone down."
Posted by:Besoeker

#10  So today I joined the VFW on the slight chance it might annoy Obama a bit. I can hope.
Posted by: Phereper mike   2016-06-03 23:21  

#9  sorry; being a f$&@ing airedale they didnt want us around guns unless they were bolted to aeroplanes. something about being a hazard and all....
Posted by: USN, Ret.   2016-06-03 19:48  

#8  Thinking it is the ubiquitous Mark 21, they were everywhere after the war used as gate guards at NROTC blogs. Pls correct me if I am wrong (again)

http://www.lonesentry.com/blog/naval-3-inch-mark-21-mount.html
Posted by: Shipman   2016-06-03 18:08  

#7  Probably some WW2 3" naval guns.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2016-06-03 12:10  

#6  Any USN vets out there who can tell me what type of guns those are in the illustration ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-06-03 11:21  

#5  I am really sick of all these progressive, nanny state idiots lecturing people on how they are so stupid or confused or wrong for not parroting the party line.

Keep it up assholes and I'll shove my shoe down your throat.
Posted by: DarthVader   2016-06-03 10:28  

#4  aka The Reservation - see Brave New World
Posted by: Procopius2k    2016-06-03 09:25  

#3  Why are four of the richest counties in the U.S. the ones surrounding Washington D.C., their wealth consisting of public functionaries, bureaucrats, regulators, and the lawyers and lobbyists who bribe them for favors, instead of places where actual private sector productivity occurs?

Only uneducated barbarians live outside the gates.
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-06-03 08:23  

#2  You've to read this "Pravda" Means "Truth". by Robert A. Heinlein, no mo.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-06-03 05:42  

#1  What part of Romney's bit about 47% of Americans depending on some form of government funded income and so that they would oppose any government reform was factually incorrect (whether or not you agree with Romney about anything else)?

What part about Reagan's observation that we have multigenerational welfare families (read: single mommies and disability cheats) was factually incorrect?

What part of Bill Clinton's observation that the era of big government should end was factually incorrect?

Why are four of the richest counties in the U.S. the ones surrounding Washington D.C., their wealth consisting of public functionaries, bureaucrats, regulators, and the lawyers and lobbyists who bribe them for favors, instead of places where actual private sector productivity occurs?

Why is this pattern repeated around state capitals and state-funded university towns across America?
Posted by: no mo uro   2016-06-03 05:23  

00:00