You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
Federal judge sides with House Republicans against health care law
2016-05-13
[Chicago Tribune] A federal judge ruled Thursday that the Obama administration is unconstitutionally spending federal money to fund the president's health care law.

The ruling from U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer is a win for House Republicans who brought the politically charged legal challenge in an effort to undermine the law.

At stake is $175 billion the government is paying over a decade to reimburse health insurers for reducing co-payments for lower-income people.

The House argued that Congress never specifically appropriated that money and has denied the administration's request for it. It says the administration is spending the money anyway, exceeding its constitutional authority. The administration has said it is using other, previously approved money.
Posted by:Fred

#7  The Supreme Court just makes up shit so these lower court rulings mean little to nothing. Roberts will say something like 'since the billions for insurance countries were borrowed they do not need congressional approval...' Or 'affordable care implies unlimited federally funded; therefore, it is legal...' Blah blah blah.
Posted by: Airandee   2016-05-13 06:14  

#6  Preference Cascade in action: and we owe this all to Donald's big mouth---the boy who said "The PC King is naked."
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-05-13 03:22  

#5  Judges are notorious for supporting the party in power. With Trump steam rolling to the White House, the judges are just swinging back to what appears to them to be the emerging side.
Posted by: Flusomp Ulealing1586   2016-05-13 00:48  

#4  Dude - that's wicked pissa!

(Boston thing)
Posted by: Raj   2016-05-13 00:48  

#3  There was one hopeful sign within the high court last week. Justice Ginsburg was quoted as saying 'she would rather pee without men in her bathroom.'

Perhaps there is hope.
Posted by: Besoeker   2016-05-13 00:44  

#2  I'm sure the Supreme Court will find it's all okey-dokey - maybe it's not 'real' money but just some electronic funds and Congress only has to appropriate the real money, with the Administration able to spend all the fake money it likes.
Posted by: Glenmore   2016-05-13 00:33  

#1  This is all sorts of screwed up - Congress should have shut the whole thing down from the start because this was freaking obvious.
Posted by: Raj   2016-05-13 00:30  

00:00