Submit your comments on this article |
-Lurid Crime Tales- |
The Panama Papers - YOU AIN'T SEEN NOTHING YET! |
2016-04-04 |
![]() Makes all the others look small! It's follow all the offshore money parked in Panama since 1975! The Panama Papers: what you need to know What is Mossack Fonseca, how big is it, and who uses offshore firms? Key questions about one of the biggest ever data leaks Revealed: the $2bn offshore trail that leads to Vladimir Putin Iceland’s PM faces snap election over revelations Fifa faces new credibility crisis over leaked papers Luke Harding Sunday 3 April 2016 16.49 EDT Share on Pinterest Share on LinkedIn Share on Google+ Shares 8837 Save for later What is Mossack Fonseca? It is a Panama-based law firm whose services include incorporating companies in offshore jurisdictions such as the British Virgin Islands. It administers offshore firms for a yearly fee. Other services include wealth management. Where is it based? The firm is Panamanian but runs a worldwide operation. Its website boasts of a global network with 600 people working in 42 countries. It has franchises around the world, where separately owned affiliates sign up new customers and have exclusive rights to use its brand. Mossack Fonseca operates in tax havens including Switzerland, Cyprus and the British Virgin Islands, and in the British crown dependencies Guernsey, Jersey and the Isle of Man. How big is it? Mossack Fonseca is the world’s fourth biggest provider of offshore services. It has acted for more than 300,000 companies. There is a strong UK connection. More than half of the companies are registered in British-administered tax havens, as well as in the UK itself. How much data has been leaked? A lot. The leak is one of the biggest ever ‐ larger than the US diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks in 2010, and the secret intelligence documents given to journalists by Edward Snowden in 2013. There are 11.5m documents and 2.6 terabytes of information drawn from Mossack Fonseca’s internal database. Are all people who use offshore structures crooks? No. Using offshore structures is entirely legal. There are many legitimate reasons for doing so. Business people in countries such as Russia and Ukraine typically put their assets offshore to defend them from "raids" by criminals, and to get around hard currency restrictions. Others use offshore for reasons of inheritance and estate planning. Are some people who use offshore structures crooks? Yes. In a speech last year in Singapore, David Cameron said "the corrupt, criminals and money launderers" take advantage of anonymous company structures. The government is trying to do something about this. It wants to set up a central register that will reveal the beneficial owners of offshore companies. From June, UK companies will have to reveal their "significant" owners for the first time. What does Mossack Fonseca say about the leak? The firm won’t discuss specific cases of alleged wrongdoing, citing client confidentiality. But it robustly defends its conduct. Mossack Fonseca says it complies with anti-money-laundering laws and carries out thorough due diligence on all its clients. It says it regrets any misuse of its services and tries actively to prevent it. The firm says it cannot be blamed for failings by intermediaries, who include banks, law firms and accountants. |
Posted by:3dc |
#14 NasDaq on Putin etc.. |
Posted by: 3dc 2016-04-04 17:32 |
#13 Whatever happened to all the US tax cheats from UBS? UBS paid a big fine for helping US clients cheat taxes then crickets. |
Posted by: dk70 the scantily clad 2016-04-04 16:41 |
#12 Let it slide EU? I HillBilly shows up they'll be renting bulldozers and backhoes to bury it fast and deep. |
Posted by: AlanC 2016-04-04 13:57 |
#11 I believe Putin to be the target here. |
Posted by: newc 2016-04-04 12:52 |
#10 The IRS is going to enjoy this leak! Maybe. If they weren't so busy with the Tea Party. And I'm sure if they find Bill and Hillary on the list they'll let it slide. |
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2016-04-04 12:19 |
#9 In the past these leaks have always wound up somewhere on the net. I'm starting to think this one won't. Imagine if just anyone knew how this sort of 'tax management' was done... |
Posted by: Iblis 2016-04-04 12:12 |
#8 The IRS is going to enjoy this leak! Don't doubt it. |
Posted by: 3dc 2016-04-04 11:59 |
#7 By the way, the father of Jurgen Mossack -- the big bug in this operation -- was Waffen SS. |
Posted by: Omusomp Grundy8829 2016-04-04 11:32 |
#6 "The outrage here is justifiably centered on corruption of public officials. I would also add that the NSA, FBI, Interpol and all the rest had nothing to do with this leak." You want the real source? Start with German intelligence service. |
Posted by: Omusomp Grundy8829 2016-04-04 11:26 |
#5 "Yes, this money belongs to the people who earned it." Mossack-Fonseca has been handling accounts from more than 200 "countries." There is enough here -- including the data on Brazil and Argentina -- to keep journalists/investigators busy for years. Hell, M-F activity in Nevada should be worth at least a year. Finally, the next shoe to drop after Nevada will be the "trust" cover-ups in South Dakota and Wyoming. |
Posted by: Omusomp Grundy8829 2016-04-04 11:23 |
#4 I'll bite. Privacy in private affairs is just part of being a citizen. Without it, you aren't. Openness in public affairs is part of living in a healthy democracy. Without it, you aren't. The outrage here is justifiably centered on corruption of public officials. I would also add that the NSA, FBI, Interpol and all the rest had nothing to do with this leak. |
Posted by: Iblis 2016-04-04 10:40 |
#3 Are Bill and Hilarity on the list? |
Posted by: Skidmark 2016-04-04 09:31 |
#2 Yes, this money belongs to the people who earned it. People do not belong to governments , that's the north korea/ USA model. |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2016-04-04 08:49 |
#1 Anyone care to argue that privacy is a good thing. |
Posted by: phil_b 2016-04-04 08:47 |