You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Dem says Russian subs 'dangerously close' to U.S.
2016-03-22
Russian President Vladimir Putin is deploying nuclear-armed submarines "dangerously close" to the United States and European allies, a Senate Democrat said following a trip to the Arctic Circle.

"No one is suggesting that Putin is contemplating a nuclear launch against a NATO country, but it's not clear how tethered to reality Putin is," Connecticut Sen. Chris Murphy told reporters Monday. "And it should make us nervous that many of his submarines are starting to get dangerously close to the U.S. and our allies."
Well Senator, you make a nice case to the press. How about making one to your leadership? Perhaps the Senate Minority Leader, Sec DoD, and President should hear what you're saying...
It' prob'ly because the evil Pubs cut military funding, damn them.
Murphy made the comments while arguing that the Navy needs to pursue an aggressive plan to replace aging American submarines, which can thwart rival countries from gathering intelligence and maintain the security of global shipping lanes.

In recent years, Putin's navy has pursued a more aggressive strategy even than during the Cold War, according to Murphy. "Russian submarines have been pushing out to the very precipice of NATO-ally waters," he said. "We have seen Russian boats coming closer to the U.S. and to our European partner ports than ever before, in immensely provocative ways — in ways that were rare even during the days of the Cold War."

Pentagon officials currently plan to scale back production of modern attack submarines in order to preserve funding for the Ohio-class submarines that carry nuclear weapons. "You're going have to look at this program with a national lens because if you drop this into the middle of a Navy shipbuilding budget it will just gut Navy shipbuilding for decades to come," Navy Secretary Ray Mabus told a House panel last week.

Murphy wants the Navy to build those Ohio-class submarines without cutting production of other modern attack submarines. "We've got to find a way to do both," he said. "If you look at the pace of Russian and Chinese building programs, we can't afford to drop Virginia-class production back to one for more than a year."
How many Ohio boats do we need? I'd think the attack subs are more useful right now...
Posted by:Steve White

#8  Scoop Jackson, where are you?
Posted by: Spomock Gurly-Brown7353   2016-03-22 22:41  

#7  "Bush backed the land forces!"
Posted by: WarDoof   2016-03-22 15:08  

#6  Maybe Ramius is planning to defect.
Posted by: SteveS   2016-03-22 11:19  

#5  Sub-builder General Dynamics is in Murphy's back yard.
Posted by: Pappy   2016-03-22 11:01  

#4  Russians don't shit without a plan, son...
Posted by: Raj   2016-03-22 10:59  

#3  "it's not clear how tethered to reality Putin is"

He seems to be achieving much more foreign-policy wise than Teh Zero is doing...
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2016-03-22 05:22  

#2  A distraction?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2016-03-22 05:09  

#1  Yokay fine, but FYI as a Madonna fan I have to tell the truth + say that God + My Ancestors' Ghosts-Spirits were far more concerned about the CHINA-VS-US over Guam + Pacific Islands, etc. than Russia's = Vlad/VladVedev Subs.

Back in the day, many decades ago.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2016-03-22 02:02  

00:00