Submit your comments on this article | ||
China-Japan-Koreas | ||
North Korea lost a submarine, defense officials say | ||
2016-03-12 | ||
[FOXNEWS] ![]()
North Korea does not operate large ballistic missile submarines, such as the U.S. Navy’s Ohio-class fleet.
| ||
Posted by:Fred |
#9 i would not be surprised if kimel pork used this as an excuse... |
Posted by: USN, Ret. 2016-03-12 17:01 |
#8 I'd vote for a defection. |
Posted by: phil_b 2016-03-12 15:02 |
#7 Does missing also mean we don't know where it is ? Even a two man sub can carry a small device. Range to ROK or Japan ports? Pudgy is nuts after all. Even just a nuke kaboom in open ocean does make a new threat credible. |
Posted by: NoMoreBS 2016-03-12 12:04 |
#6 Darned screen doors! |
Posted by: Sonny Bumble7713 2016-03-12 08:56 |
#5 Now a minor motion picture (not starring Sean Connery): "The Hunt For Red Kimchee" Somewhere under north Pacific, a submarine commander has decided to defect... |
Posted by: ed in texas 2016-03-12 08:19 |
#4 ...1) I have no fondness for the North Koreans, but I hope that the crew went fast. That's an awful way to go. 2) I am hoping that Fat Boy and the rest of the asylum don't decide that the US/ROK didn't whack the boat as revenge for (FILL IN NORK OFFENSE HERE). With the exercise season in full blast over there, this was a bad time for this to happen. Mike |
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski 2016-03-12 08:13 |
#3 Anything is submersible, once. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2016-03-12 07:36 |
#2 Think Pudge swallowed it when he was eating his Corn Flakes |
Posted by: Bov Flimbers 2016-03-12 03:12 |
#1 Kim, you lost ANOTHER submarine? |
Posted by: European Conservative 2016-03-12 02:12 |