Submit your comments on this article |
Arabia |
War Between Saudi Arabia And Iran Could Send Oil Prices To $250 |
2016-01-15 |
The back-and-forth escalation quickly turned the simmering tension into an overt struggle for power in the Middle East. First, the execution of a prominent Shiite cleric prompted protestors to set fire to the Saudi embassy in Tehran. Saudi Arabia cut off diplomatic relations and kicked out Iranian diplomatic personnel. Tehran banned Saudi goods from entering Iran. Worst of all, Iran blames Saudi Arabia for an airstrike that landed near its embassy in Yemen. Saudi Arabia's Sunni allies in the Arabian Peninsula largely followed suit by downgrading diplomatic ties with Iran. However, recognizing the dire implications of a major conflict in the region, most of Saudi Arabia's Gulf State allies did not go as far as to entirely sever diplomatic relations, as Saudi Arabia did. Bahrain, the one nation most closely allied with Riyadh, was the only one to take such a step. Many of them are concerned about a descent to further instability. Nations like Kuwait and Qatar have trade links with Iran, plus Shiite populations of their own. Crucially, Qatar also shares a maritime border with Iran as well as access to massive natural gas reserves in the Persian Gulf. These countries are trying to split the difference between the two belligerent nations in the Middle East. "The Saudis are on the phone lobbying countries very hard to break off ties with Iran but most Gulf states are trying to find some common ground," a diplomat from an Arab country told Reuters. "The problem is, common ground between everyone in this region is shrinking." The effect from the brewing conflict on oil is murky, but for now it is not having a bullish impact. In the past, geopolitical tension in the Middle East, especially involving large oil producers, would add a few dollars to the price of oil. This risk premium captured the possibility of a supply disruption into the price of a barrel of crude. However, recent events barely registered in oil trading. That is because the global glut in oil supplies loom larger than any potential for a supply disruption. Oil dropped to nearly $30 per barrel on January 12 and oil speculators are not paying any attention to the tension in the Middle East. |
Posted by:Besoeker |
#5 You mean other than the entire global economy screeching to a halt then quickly keeling over dead with its little feet in the air when oil is sustained for long north of ~$150/bbl or so? Aside from that I suppose the downside would probably be limited. |
Posted by: Halliburton - Foreign Affairs Division 2016-01-15 19:55 |
#4 So what is the problem with that? It will be a price spike. The world gets off Saudi and Iranian oil. Russia gets back into the game. US oil production climbs, especially fracking, Nigeria does ok. Venezuela can't get it together whatever the price. Saudi and Iran destroy each other. The world becomes a better place. What is the downside? |
Posted by: Alaska Paul 2016-01-15 18:25 |
#3 ![]() |
Posted by: Lampedusa Creretch3679 2016-01-15 17:42 |
#2 Cause they're sitting around with their fracking rigs just waiting for an opportunity to present itself. What Procopius2k said. America still imports 40-60% of the oil we use. If we increase domestic supply, even without exporting, that much is freed up to supply the rest of the world, putting a significant damper on prices. Is Russian production constrained by European sanctions? That would change quickly if Middle Eastern supplies are blocked. |
Posted by: trailing wife 2016-01-15 10:34 |
#1 Lifting the ban on exporting oil could mean a complete shift in the balance of trade calcs. Oil dropped to nearly $30 per barrel on January 12 and oil speculators are not paying any attention to the tension in the Middle East. Cause they're sitting around with their fracking rigs just waiting for an opportunity to present itself. |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2016-01-15 08:16 |