Submit your comments on this article |
-Lurid Crime Tales- |
Former U.S. attorney: Clinton could face criminal indictment |
2016-01-06 |
[Washington Examiner] A former U.S. attorney thinks Hillary Clinton could face a criminal indictment from the FBI within the next 60 days. Joe DiGenova, a Republican U.S. attorney appointed by President Reagan, said Clinton's "biggest problem right now" is the open FBI investigation into the contents of her private emails. "They have reached a critical mass in their investigation of the secretary and all of her senior staff," DiGenova said Tuesday on the "Laura Ingraham Show" radio program. "And, it's going to come to a head, I would suggest, in the next 60 days." FBI Director James Comey has refused to answer questions about when his agents will wrap up a months-long probe into whether Clinton and her staff mishandled classified information on an unsecured network. |
Posted by:Besoeker |
#8 "Could" is the key word. Queen Elizabeth "could" divorce Prince Philip and marry Mike Tyson... |
Posted by: Grunter 2016-01-06 18:03 |
#7 If she does face indictment its because the Dems don't want her. The indictment alone would probably give the primary to Sanders. Then things could be dropped so that she avoids prison. More likely the FBI will clear her of all wrongdoing in the days before the primary to give her a boost. It would be interesting to see how an indictment could be twisted by the fevered left to be W's fault. |
Posted by: rjschwarz 2016-01-06 15:05 |
#6 Not a chance in hell. She has too much on everyone else and she really is the only viable establishment dhimocrat candidate. There is no way that she will go down for this. |
Posted by: DarthVader 2016-01-06 13:25 |
#5 If she goes down she'll most likely take others with her. Not good for business. |
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2016-01-06 11:57 |
#4 Prepping his resume? |
Posted by: Procopius2k 2016-01-06 11:38 |
#3 Not a chance. The Atty general will never let it get to that point. they will find some scapegoat to pin it on (assuming they even admit they found anything). |
Posted by: CrazyFool 2016-01-06 11:09 |
#2 I think Sandy Burglar set a precedent that the law doesn't apply to democratic party operators. |
Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2016-01-06 11:09 |
#1 In a better world, no question about it. In Obama's America, well it all depends... |
Posted by: Iblis 2016-01-06 11:01 |