You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
Newly Released Email Shows Forces Were Ready to Deploy to Benghazi
2015-12-09
[PJ Media] A new email released today by Judicial Watch shows that the Department of Defense was ready to mobilize forces to Benghazi three and a half hours after the attack began.

An email was sent by then-Department of Defense Chief of Staff Jeremy Bash to State Department leadership that offered "forces that could move to Benghazi" during the terrorist attack on the U.S. Special Mission Compound in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012.

In an email sent to top Department of State officials, at 7:19 p.m. ET, only hours after the attack had begun, Bash says, "we have identified the forces that could move to Benghazi. They are spinning up as we speak." The Obama administration redacted the details of the military forces available, oddly citing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) exemption that allows the withholding of "deliberative process" information.

Bash's email seems to directly contradict testimony given by then-Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta before the Senate Armed Services Committee in February 2013. Defending the Obama administration's lack of military response to the nearly six-hour-long attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Panetta claimed that "time, distance, the lack of an adequate warning, events that moved very quickly on the ground prevented a more immediate response."

Panetta said the 130 gunships or fixed wing fighters -- which would have required refueling abilities, armaments, targeting and support facilities -- "were not in the vicinity of Benghazi."

"During NEOs (Non-Combatant Evacuation Operations), the US Ambassador is the senior authority for the evacuation and is ultimately responsible for the successful completion of the NEO and the safety of the evacuees. The Ambassador speaks with the authority of the President and serves as direct representative on site." LINK

In the absence of the chargé d'affaires, NEO and/or 'In-Extremis Force' decision making recommendations rest with the Country Team, Foggy Bottom, with POTUS as final decision maker. We were lied to at the time and we continue to be lied to about Benghazi.
Posted by:Besoeker

#4  Recollect the rumors at the time regarding general officers being instantly relieved for pressing an intervention. Put Gen Carter Ham under oath. There was also an admiral involved, as I remember.
Posted by: KBK   2015-12-09 10:37  

#3  We may never know the entire truth about Benghazi. What we do know is, the truth has not yet been revealed.

Clinton has a number of these beltway insiders in her Philipp Reines 'Beacon Global Strategies' holding pen. It's a brotherhood, a fraternity. They seldom turn on one another.
Posted by: Besoeker   2015-12-09 08:37  

#2  As much as you dislike the man, Trump would be the only candidate running ads exploiting this against a Hillary campaign after the nomination. The rest are too PC, too get-along, too stupid to understand its war by other means.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-12-09 08:22  

#1  Not sending forces when they were available is as much as aiding and abetting the enemy. Lying about it is obstructing justice. About time that this seamy bunch responsible for the debacle be prosecuted (although that will never happen). Treason seems like a reasonable charge.
Posted by: JohnQC   2015-12-09 07:49  

00:00