Submit your comments on this article | |
Home Front: Politix | |
Security farce at 'data fortress' that held Clinton's emails | |
2015-10-13 | |
| |
Posted by:Steve White |
#6 That was more than two years ago, so by liberal definition it didn't matter anymore. |
Posted by: gorb 2015-10-13 18:46 |
#5 HILLARY’S SERVER WASN’T JUST VULNERABLE, IT WAS EXTRA-VULNERABLE TO HACKERS |
Posted by: Vast Right Wing Conspiracy 2015-10-13 13:46 |
#4 Data fortress? It was probably an MS Exchange server. Maybe with all the patches. Maybe. Two minutes with Kali Linux -- if you were using it for the first time. |
Posted by: Iblis 2015-10-13 11:11 |
#3 True enough Rambler, but physical access gives one a whole host of options... |
Posted by: Steve White 2015-10-13 10:46 |
#2 It claims it runs 'data fortresses', monitored by security 24 hours a day, where only a retinal or palm scan allows access to its facilities. Successfully protected the 'process' at least until the Platte River folks began to talk. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2015-10-13 09:45 |
#1 For the umpteenth time: to hack a computer connected to the internet, YOU DO NOT NEED PHYSICAL ACCESS TO THE COMPUTER. You could have a computer in the most secure location in the world, and as long as it has a connection to the Internet, is is potentially vulnerable to hacking. |
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia 2015-10-13 09:19 |