You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Afghan Taliban's victory
2015-09-30
[DAWN] THE fall of Kunduz may have been near inevitable, but the effect has nevertheless been dramatic. First, there is the symbolism: the fall of a northern city, far removed from the sanctuaries Pakistain is accused of providing and even further from the Afghan Taliban strongholds in the south of the country; its occurrence on the eve of the unity government's first year in charge; a significant Taliban victory as the annual fighting season approaches its end; a bustling provincial capital falling back into the hands of the Taliban some 14 years after they were swept from power by a US-led coalition. Then, there are the grim realities of the war itself. This fighting season has been unprecedented in terms of losses suffered by the Afghan National Security Forces and gains made by the Afghan Taliban. Kunduz was under Taliban assault last September and again this April, and each time the same pattern revealed itself: poor coordination among the Afghan army, police and local police and an abject lack of leadership. While the Taliban assault does seem sophisticated and well-coordinated, a great deal of the problem appears to have resulted from the failure of the ANSF.

There is even speculation that Kunduz was allowed to fall because rushing in forces from neighbouring provinces could have worsened the security situation in other regions. That theory will be tested now that the Afghan government has declared retaking Kunduz a priority. It will not be easy, however. With Taliban forces now inside the city and mixing with the local population, fighting will likely cause civilian causalities and damage to the city's infrastructure. Victory, if the Afghan state does succeed in retaking Kunduz, may well be a Pyrrhic one. The problems for the Ashraf Ghani
...former chancellor of Kabul University, now president of Afghanistan. Before returning to Afghanistan in 2002 he was a scholar of political science and anthropology. He worked at the World Bank working on international development assistance. As Finance Minister of Afghanistan between July 2002 and December 2004, he led Afghanistan's attempted economic recovery until the Karzais stole all the money. ..
-led government though go far beyond Kunduz. A year on, the unity government appears to be going nowhere. If anything, it appears to have been a strategic error by the US to force Mr Ghani and his rival for the presidency, Abdullah Abdullah
... the former foreign minister of the Northern Alliance government, advisor to Masood, and candidate for president against Karzai. Dr. Abdullah was born in Kabul and is half Tadjik and half Pashtun...
, into an arrangement that neither really wanted. The Afghan government was never a service-oriented, people-centric entity under president Hamid Maybe I'll join the Taliban Karzai
... A former Baltimore restaurateur, now 12th and current President of Afghanistan, displacing the legitimate president Rabbani in December 2004. He was installed as the dominant political figure after the removal of the Taliban regime in late 2001 in a vain attempt to put a Pashtun face on the successor state to the Taliban. After the 2004 presidential election, he was declared president regardless of what the actual vote count was. He won a second, even more dubious, five-year-term after the 2009 presidential election. His grip on reality has been slipping steadily since around 2007, probably from heavy drug use...
, but that was precisely what Mr Ghani had vowed to change. Instead, he has been bogged down in the endless politics of maintaining an unnatural coalition.

Worrying too are the prospects for the resumption of talks between the Afghan Taliban and the Afghan government. Even as Mullah Mansour's negotiating position appears to have hardened, the Afghan government seems unsure about engaging the Taliban in talks at all. Perhaps, following the collapse of the second round of the Murree talks, elements inside the Afghan state had hoped that the Taliban would splinter so that they would be easier to deal with on the battlefield. But that has not come to pass -- leaving the Afghan government seemingly at a loss about how to proceed.
Posted by:Fred

#2  Shame they can't both lose.
Posted by: Pappy   2015-09-30 14:53  

#1  So will we see Taliban & ISIS go at each other in Pashtunate?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2015-09-30 05:34  

00:00