You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Government
Crossing a Line: Jew-baiting and ethnic prejudice as tools to sell a political deal
2015-08-11
[Tablet] This use of anti-Jewish incitement as a political tool is a sickening new development in American political discourse, and we have heard too much of it lately--some coming, ominously, from our own White House and its representatives. Let's not mince words: Murmuring about "money" and "lobbying" and "foreign interests" who seek to drag America into war is a direct attempt to play the dual-loyalty card. It's the kind of dark, nasty stuff we might expect to hear at a white power rally, not from the President of the United States--and it's gotten so blatant that even many of us who are generally sympathetic to the administration, and even this deal, have been shaken by it.

We do not accept the idea that Senator Schumer or anyone else is a fair target for racist incitement, anymore than we accept the idea that the basic norms of political discourse in this country do not apply to Jews. Whatever one feels about the merits of the Iran deal, sales techniques that call into question the patriotism of American Jews are examples of bigotry--no matter who does it. On this question, we should all stand in defense of Senator Schumer.
Nothing at all new here. See Sharpton, Jackson, or a mirror for more details.
Posted by:Besoeker

#7  Remember it was the National Socialist Workers Party. Didn't work too well with the International Socialists aka communists in Russia either. Seemed to recall a lot of effort to aid Russian Jews immigration in the 70s and 80s.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-08-11 17:06  

#6  Obama & The Mullahs only need 1/3+1 in either chamber. Democrats have ample maneuvering space for failure theater.

Isn't Schumer supposed to be one of the more influential Democrats in the Senate? Is he actively lobbying other MOC to vote against the deal?

In the end is he really trying to bring down this abomination or is he just washing his hands to placate a sceptical electorate & donor class?
Posted by: Elmerert Hupens2660   2015-08-11 17:05  

#5  I knew you were gonna say that.
Posted by: Shipman   2015-08-11 16:32  

#4  Biggotry. I hate predictive text.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2015-08-11 16:06  

#3  True, tw, I've read comments that he's just doing what his Masters in Jerusalem told him to. Biggs try is alive and well.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2015-08-11 13:13  

#2  Senator Schumer's statement on his decision to vote against President Obama's deal here. He is being lambasted as a straightforward Israel-loyal traitor, with none of the mealy-mouthed dog whistles mentioned in the article.
Posted by: trailing wife   2015-08-11 11:24  

#1  I'm surprised Shumer grew a spine, or was it that his donors gave him an option.
Let's just see where he stands on the veto override. I'll bet he is missing.
Posted by: jvalentour   2015-08-11 10:36  

00:00