You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Land of the Free
Mark Steyn: The War on Free Speech
2015-05-11
[STEYNONLINE]
Alas, we have raised a generation of But boys. Ever since those ridiculous Washington Post and AP headlines, I've been thinking about the fellows who write and sub-edit and headline and approve such things - and never see the problem with it. Why would they? If you're under a certain age, you accept instinctively that free speech is subordinate to other considerations: If you've been raised in the "safe space" of American universities, you take it as read that on gays and climate change and transgendered bathrooms and all kinds of other issues it's perfectly normal to eliminate free speech and demand only the party line. So what's the big deal about letting Muslims cut themselves in on a little of that action?

Why would you expect people who see nothing wrong with destroying a mom'n'pop bakery over its antipathy to gay wedding cakes to have any philosophical commitment to diversity of opinion? And once you no longer have any philosophical commitment to it it's easy to see it the way Miliband and Cotler do - as a rusty cog in the societal machinery that can be shaved and sliced millimeter by millimeter.

Do what the parochial hacks of the US media didn't bother to do, and look at the winning entry in Pam Geller's competition, which appears at the top of this page. It's by Bosch Fawstin, an Eisner Award-winning cartoonist and an ex-Muslim of Albanian stock. Like many of the Danish and French cartoons, it's less about Mohammed than about the prohibition against drawing Mohammed - and the willingness of a small number of Muslims to murder those who do, and a far larger number of Muslims both enthusiastic and quiescent to support those who kill. Mr Fawstin understands the remorseless logic of one-way multiculturalism - that it leads to the de facto universal acceptance of Islamic law. All that "Prophet Mohammed" stuff, now routine even on Fox News. He's not my prophet, he's just some dead bloke. But the formulation is now mysteriously standard in western media. Try it the other way round: "Isis News Network, from our Libyan correspondent: Warriors of the Caliphate today announced record attendance numbers for the mass beheading of followers of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ..."
Posted by:Fred

#6  'But boys' - nice turn of phrase...
Posted by: Raj   2015-05-11 13:09  

#5  The purpose of left-wing press is to make left-wing politicians look good. Sometimes, they try to do it by publishing things that make the later look good (or not publishing things that make them look bad). Sometimes, by publishing opinions that make left-wing politicians look moderate by comparison.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2015-05-11 12:46  

#4  
Posted by: junkiron   2015-05-11 11:01  

#3  awesome comment from Mark Steyne
Posted by: anon1   2015-05-11 10:01  

#2  Read the whole thing, lots more at the link...

"...understand that Islamic imperialism has a good-cop-bad-cop game - or hard jihad, soft jihad. The hard jihad is fought via bombings and beheadings and burnings over barren bits of desert and jungle and cave country in the Middle East, Africa and the Hindu Kush. The soft jihad is a suppler enemy fighting for rather more valuable real estate in Europe, Australia and North America, so it uses western shibboleths of "diversity" and "multiculturalism" to enfeeble those societies. And it does so very effectively - so that when a British soldier is hacked to death on a London street in broad daylight, you can't really quite articulate what's wrong with it; or that, upon the death of the ugly king of a state where Christianity is prohibited, the Christian ministers of Westminster Abbey mourn his passing; or that, when Australians are held siege in a Sydney coffee shop, the reflexive response of progressive persons is to launch a social-media campaign offering to battle Islamophobia by helping Muslims get to work; or that, when violent Muslims stage their first explicit anti-free-speech attack on American soil, everyone thinks the mouthy free-speech broad is the problem. This soft jihad goes on every day of the week"
Posted by: dlr   2015-05-11 09:36  

#1  save a high res jpeg of the charlie hebdo cover - not "all is forgiven" because it isn't, but "100 lashes if you don't die laughing", sharia hebdo

make a logo "freedom is my religion" with 2 more mohammads: jyllands posten bomb mohammad and a happy mohammad for balance

put them on a t-shirt

proudly wear it.

they can censor it from the news media

but if you are freely expressing your own beliefs on your own t-shirt they can't censor that.

and be polite and nice, to all. be lovely to all muslims they might be secular allies you never know.

but that shirt says: i respect freedom which includes freedom for me to draw and display cartoons of mohammad. get used to it.

in this country yes you will see cartoons of mohammad. if you can't deal with it, there are 57 nations in the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation where guaranteed you won't see a cartoon of mohammamd

but right here, you will because i will not give up my freedom for someone else's faith
Posted by: anon1   2015-05-11 08:26  

00:00