| Submit your comments on this article |
| Government |
| FBI pushing tech companies and congress for law for backdoor for government |
| 2015-05-05 |
| Posted by:DarthVader |
| #13 Probably because no one's having kids anymore. The illegal aliens are having lots of kids. You can expect the bill on April 15. |
| Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2015-05-05 16:14 |
| #12 #3 It's for the children! It's interesting how we don't hear this phrase as much anymore. Probably because no one's having kids anymore. Also interesting to note that today's Millenial neckbeards and neon coiffed SJWs are the "children" for which all the protections of the Eighties/Nineties were put in place. |
| Posted by: charger 2015-05-05 16:10 |
| #11 The tragic events of Waco convinced me of that BP. Everything since is just additional confirmation. I'm still trying to fit the Benghazi pieces together, your Blue Mountain Security, Aegis, the Turkish connection, etc. It will all surface eventually I suppose. |
| Posted by: Besoeker 2015-05-05 15:04 |
| #10 I'm beginning to suspect most of the security apparatus is there to protect the interests of the state AGAINST the people. It's just sold as protecting the people. |
| Posted by: Bright Pebbles 2015-05-05 14:58 |
| #9 Whenever there's a domestic terrorism incident, for some reason the FBI confirms they were monitoring the perp and that they did nothing. I am reassured (That a suburban TX traffic cop can properly execute a headshot under duress). |
| Posted by: regular joe 2015-05-05 13:18 |
| #8 Wouldn't it be easier just to keep the Somalis, Chechens and Arabs out of this country in the first place? Yeah right.... actually solve the problem and we won't have any more reasons for violating people's rights... can't have that! See Also War on Terror, War ion Drugs, War on Poverty, etc... |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2015-05-05 12:01 |
| #7 |
| Posted by: 2015-05-05 11:47 |
| #6 Wouldn't it be easier just to keep the Somalis, Chechens and Arabs out of this country in the first place? |
| Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305 2015-05-05 11:46 |
| #5 Feds get info from Russia on Tsarnev and do nothing. All they want to do is to intimidate the law abiding people who don't raise hell. And they get a pass. |
| Posted by: Alaska Paul 2015-05-05 11:29 |
| #4 What happened to the 4th Amendment? You know, the one that says: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. The Feds having unrestricted power? All the more reason for Constitutional protections. It is not obsolete or passe but more important than ever. |
| Posted by: JohnQC 2015-05-05 10:20 |
| #3 It's for the children! We can't have them exposed to views and ideas which are out of alignment with their indoctrination! |
| Posted by: CrazyFool 2015-05-05 09:18 |
| #2 The FBI has a fundamental belief that the What do they want to do? Be able to say they had (anyone) people under observation again before said people did something despicable? They got it now with dangerous people and do absolutely nothing till after the fact. Their problem isn't date collection, it's the internal processes to act upon what they already have. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2015-05-05 09:16 |
| #1 No. You can't snoop in my stuff without a warrant. That is why we have the 4th amendment assholes. The above is in plain text so you fucknuts can read it. As is the below. Fuck off. |
| Posted by: DarthVader 2015-05-05 08:54 |