You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Signs, Portents, and the Weather-
Anti-vaxxer mother recants after her seven children contract whooping cough
2015-04-13
[TELEGRAPH.CO.UK] A Canadian mother-of-seven has been forced to rethink her anti-vaccination stance -- after all her children fell sick with whooping cough.
That's the sort of thing that happens when you take your health care advice from Playboy centerfolds.
North America has seen a growing number of families opt out of immunisation programmes, frequently because they are concerned about side-effects, despite warnings that deadly childhood diseases such as measles are on the rise.

Tara Hills and her husband decided to stop vaccinating their children six years ago after losing faith in the health care system, according to a blog post in which she described the family's experience.

"I'm writing this from quarantine, the irony of which isn't lost on me," she said.

Although her first three children were immunised - on what she described as an "alternative schedule" - the youngest four received no vaccinations at all.

"I just got scared. I got spooked. I thought, 'There's a lot of smoke, there must be fire.' We stopped vaccinating," she told CBC News.

Then last month the coughing began. It sounded like a bad cold at first.

"But a week after the symptoms started the kids weren't improving, in fact they were getting worse," wrote Mrs Hills. "And the cough. No one had a runny nose or sneezing but they all had the same unproductive cough."

A trip to the doctor's surgery was followed by hospital tests, which confirmed whooping cough.

The highly infectious disease takes its name from the characteristic whoop noise that young children make following a cough as they struggle to catch their breath.

Young infants are at particular risk of severe complications and even death.

Vaccinations have massively reduced the number fatalities, which once ran at 10,000 a year in the US, according to KidsHealth.
Posted by:Fred

#9  The estimates for botched medical care leading to death in hospitals runs around 200,000+ annually. Meanwhile gun homicides run about 11,000+. So which is more dangerous to the average person?

That's the sort of thing that happens when you take your health care advice from Playboy centerfolds.

..or who to vote for President.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2015-04-13 19:31  

#8  If you don't trust doctors enough to vacinated why would you trust them when it comes to surgery and other things?
Posted by: rjschwarz   2015-04-13 15:31  

#7  Still within my parents living memory is where they had a sick room in most houses. It was only used when people got sick and were quarantined. Those fell out of popularity/necessity as vaccinations drove away those diseases that required them.

With all these idiots not vaccinating, we might be seeing those rooms again.
Posted by: DarthVader   2015-04-13 11:38  

#6  There was an interesting point made in the Australian papers yesterday, that anti-vaxxer parents are still immunising their kids against one disease- tetanus. Tetanus is not caused by human-to-human transmission, it is soil borne. So if you want immunity against tetanus, it's up to you to get the shots. For the rest, a parasitic free ride on herd immunity is feasible, or was until there were enough free riders to break down herd immunity for the population as a whole.
Posted by: Grunter   2015-04-13 10:58  

#5  "Recants" may not be the right word. Doubt she thought they couldn't get sick. More likely she weighed the risk of disease against the perceived risk of the vaccine itself. Took her chances and came up snake eyes.
Posted by: Iblis   2015-04-13 10:35  

#4  #5 For all the leftists who claim that anti-science is a predominantly center/right thing, I give you exhibit A as to why it is not.

Get a map of the U.S. Stick a pin into it every place there is a Whole Foods. Within a 30 mile radius of all the pins you'll find 99% of your antivaxx population. Their voting habits are decidedly left of center.
Posted by: no mo uro   2015-04-13 05:43  

#3  #1, you are a math challenged fool.

You have it exactly backwards. Every woman who is fertile enough to do so should have at least three children. Attrition due to childhood disease and trauma, disease, and the occasional infertile woman demand that this be the case.

Above and beyond tw's bit about elder care, there is also the concern that your nation will not be able to have workers for an agricultural or industrial workforce, or a military sufficiently large enough to defend your nation. A billion seventh century sociopaths need a deterrent after all.
Posted by: no mo uro   2015-04-13 05:33  

#2  nobody should have more than 3 maximum. totally irresponsible. needs birth control

Given how many aren't having any at all these days, it's nice she's providing members of the next generation to pay taxes to support us in our old age. I suggested to the trailing daughters and the fosterlings that they have four apiece precisely for that reeason. Trailing daughter just got hired for her first professional job; in July she will be appalled at how much of her earnt income will be taken out of each paycheck for the social security/government pension and retirement medical benefits that she will never see, and for her children's generation it will be worse.

On the other hand, there's always the possibility that this woman's children will end up blind, deaf, insane, sterile, mentally retarded, and/or dead from the diseases they'll get for lack of vaccinations, in which case having seven won't have been enough to beat the odds.
Posted by: trailing wife   2015-04-13 04:55  

#1  why has she got 7 children?

nobody should have more than 3 maximum. totally irresponsible. needs birth control
Posted by: anon1   2015-04-13 03:57  

00:00