You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
U.S. Senate to Vote on Nuclear Iran Bill after Talks Deadline
2015-03-21
[AnNahar] A U.S. Senate committee will vote April 14 on a bipartisan measure requiring President Barack Obama
I bowled a 129. It’s like — it was like Special Olympics, or something...
to submit any international nuclear deal with Iran for congressional review, the legislation's authors said Thursday.

Senate Foreign Relations Committee chairman Bob Corker and top panel Democrat Robert Menendez agreed to push back a vote on the controversial bill until two weeks beyond the March 31 deadline negotiators set for the outlines of an accord between Iran and world powers aimed at preventing the Islamic republic from developing nuclear weapons.

"We have been working together very closely to ensure we have the strongest vote possible on the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act, and to achieve that result we have agreed to a markup of the bill...as soon as we return on Tuesday, April 14," the senators said in a statement.

Earlier this year, amid intense congressional debate over how to pressure Tehran toward a lasting deal that bars it from developing a bomb, a group of Democrats warned they would not vote in support of the bipartisan bill until after March 24, to give the negotiations a chance to succeed.

The Corker-Menendez bill would require Obama to submit any deal between Iran and the so-called P5+1 -- Britannia, China, La Belle France, Russia, the United States and Germany -- to Congress, which would have 60 days to review the accord and, if it so decided, to reject it.

The legislation is distinct from a new sanctions effort that would tighten economic penalties on Iran in the event an accord is not achieved or Tehran violates the deal.

Thursday's announcement virtually assures that Congress will take no vote regarding Iran's nuclear program until after the March 31 deadline.

President Barack Obama's administration has warned that congressional action at the height of negotiations could infuriate Iran and provide it with an excuse to pull out of talks.
What use the Senatorial bill, even if matched by the same in the House and with enough votes to override a oresidential veto, if the president takes the thing straight to the UN Security Council first, and they approve it? Just because it isn't binding on the US does not mean enough of the rest of the world will also choose not to be bound by the thing. Once the omelette is made, Humpty Dumpty can't be put back together again.
Posted by:trailing wife

#1  "Review" ≠ approval. Zero has won this one, and those he distains has lost.

Legacies, as we are about to find out, can be dangerous things.
Posted by: Hupineger Glomomp52169    2015-03-21 11:05  

00:00