[Yahoo] From its official Twitter account, the National Security Council said
| Why, in the name of all that's holy, is the president's own National Security Council tweeting to the public like it was a couple of Kardashian sisters heading out on a shopping spree, instead of working on matters of national and international security? |
journalist Fareed Zakaria had an "interesting take" with his article noting all of the times Netanyahu had been wrong about Iran over the past 25 years:
| And why, in the name of the same holiness, are they wasting their time reading anything by that plagiarist Zakaria instead of DoD, CIA and State Department reports and analyses that will shape their discussions and the advice they finally give to the man charge with being the decider? |
The article, titled "Netanyahu enters never-never land," argues that Netanyahu's speech before Congress last Tuesday was "utterly divorced from reality." In the address, the Israeli prime minister harshly condemned the White House's still unannounced agreement with Iran, in which Tehran could agree to scale back its nuclear program if the US and other powers roll back economic sanctions.
plix.
| That's certainly one take on things. Another would be that, had the US and Israel not sabotaged Iran's nuclear effort repeatedly over the years, Iran would have nuked Israel years ago, and Mr. Zakaria would instead be reminiscing about what a rich, vibrant, productive little country the Jewish state had been before it was turned into radioactive glass during what is now called The Second Holocaust, after which President George W. Bush felt compelled to do the same to Iran as a lesson to any other countries with similar ideas. |
|