| Submit your comments on this article |
| Home Front: Politix |
| The next US defense secretary says he'll consider keeping the A-10 |
| 2015-02-06 |
| Defense Secretary nominee Ashton Carter agreed Wednesday to hear arguments from Joint Tactical Air Controllers (JTACS) for keeping the A-10 despite renewed efforts by the Air Force to retire the Thunderbolt. At his confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee, Carter told A-10 advocate Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H., that he had read letters in support of the A-10 from the Tactical Air Control Party (TACP) Association. The TACP Association represents about 3,300 active and retired JTACs who had the mission of moving forward with ground troops to select targets and call in airstrikes. Carter made no commitments on the A-10, but when asked by Ayotte if he would speak with representatives of the TACP, he said: âAbsolutely, I will.â Active-duty members of the TACP have been told not to offer opinions on the A-10, but the retired members have unanimously supported keeping the Thunderbolt, affectionately known as the Warthog in the fleet, Ayotte said. She said that the TACP members agree that the F-16, the F-15 and the B-1 bomber âcannot replicate the capabilities of the A-10â in performing the close-air support mission for ground troops. The Air Force last year sought to begin retiring the A-10s to clear the way for replacing them with the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter but Congress voted for additional funding to keep the A-10s in the fleet through fiscal year 2015. Until the F-35 is "working" and can prove that it can do the job and command shows a willingness to put them close enough to the ground and enemy fire to possibly be effective, I'd say delay retiring them. They would only save enough money to buy one fighter probably. (No, I don't believe the $3.5B cost-savings numbers because it stinks to high heaven, as did the SR-71s' cost savings numbers.) A simple model would be to say that these planes are so special because they can save the pilot's life during the mission. The A-10 could save dozens or hundreds if its life were extended. I would hate to be the guy that someone pointed to and said "your kids died because of this kind of idiot who wanted the A-10 canceled before it had a proven replacement." In its budget proposal for fiscal year 2016, the Air Force stated its intention to begin retiring the A-10 in FY 2016 âto focus available funding on more urgent combatant commander requirements.â Under the Air Force plan, about 164 A-10s would be retired in 2016 but âthe A-10 will remain operational and available for deployment until 2019.â The Air Force said the plan would save an estimated $3.5 billion over five years. At an Air Force briefing last month, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark Welsh, a former A-10 pilot, said âItâs not about not liking or not wanting the A-10. Itâs about some very tough decisions that we have to make to recapitalize an Air Force for the threat 10 years from now.â |
| Posted by:gorb |
| #6 I wonder if, like the Canadians, the British and Australians will settle for the BOMARC? |
| Posted by: Shipman 2015-02-06 21:59 |
| #5 Here's what I would do. First, I'd cancel the F-35. Dead as in doorknob-dead. For the Air Force --> New F-16s with new avionics Reopen F-22 assembly line to get ~ 100 more Rehab the current A-10s one more time Build an A-10 specific successor For the Navy --> New F-18E/Fs with new avionics Convert X-47B into a useful unmanned carrier drone Lighter X-47B variant for heavy assault ships Alternatively: build an A-6 specific successor For the Marines --> New F-18E/Fs with new avionics Rehab the current Harriers |
| Posted by: Steve White 2015-02-06 18:17 |
| #4 "It's about some very tough decisions that we have to make to recapitalize an Air Force for the threat 10 years from now." Ah yes - recapitalization. We'll get around to talking about icky military things like 'mission' much, much later. |
| Posted by: Pappy 2015-02-06 14:17 |
| #3 Either way, like gorb mentioned, you need a replacement first. Keep the A-10 |
| Posted by: newc 2015-02-06 13:11 |
| #2 He needs to consider giving the aircraft to the Army. It will end the debate. |
| Posted by: 49 Pan 2015-02-06 12:59 |
| #1 Congress can also 'consider' the promotion lists Dept of the Air Force sends over for approval too. Played this game before on Tailhook, you want to ignore Congress, they can ignore you right back where it hurts but doesn't disable. |
| Posted by: Procopius2k 2015-02-06 09:31 |