You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
John Kerry admits: U.S. wants Iran's help in bombing Islamic State
2014-12-04
[WASHINGTONTIMES] Secretary of State John F. Kerry effectively gave the green light Wednesday for Iran to use direct military force against the Islamic State
...formerly ISIS or ISIL, depending on your preference. Before that al-Qaeda in Iraq, as shaped by Abu Musab Zarqawi. They're very devout, committing every atrocity they can find in the Koran and inventing a few more. They fling Allah around with every other sentence, but to hear the pols talk they're not really Moslems....
movement in Iraq, but said there are no plans for U.S. forces to coordinate with their Iranian counterparts in battling the hard boys.
Normally I wouldn't think of giving diplomatic advice to the secretary of state, but JFK and I are almost like old friends--we were in Danang at approximately the same time, even though I didn't trip over any dead kids going up Monkey Mountain; I probably just wasn't looking close enough. So I'd suggest that Iran's national interest and its ambitions as a regional power demand pounding IS to paste by air, land, and/or sea to be a good thing. The U.S. national interest categorizes Iran's govt with bygone enemies like Nazis and Fascisti and Ostrogoths and such. Therefore they should be left uncommented and uncourted as they pursue their own interests and we pursue ours. If we occasionally bounce each other's rubble that's fine, but they can do their own targeting and their own BDA. If there's an occasional Hezbully or IRGC general standing under our ordnance that's too bad and we should stay out of their way, too. If they decide to do nothing or they do it wrong they don't rate our advice. The enemy of my enemy doesn't necessarily deserve a place on our national Christmas card list.
"I think it's self-evident that if Iran is taking on ISIL in some particular place and it's confined to taking on ISIL and it has an impact, it's going to be -- the net effect is positive," Mr. Kerry told news hounds at meeting in Brussels of the U.S.-led coalition taking military action against the group in Syria and Iraq.

His comments came amid news reports that U.S. military officials believe Iran has conducted Arclight airstrikes against targets of the Islamic State inside Iraq during recent days.
Posted by:Fred

#5  Anyhoo, ...

* See RELATED TOPIX > [CBS Local] US, IRAN BOTH STRIKING/BOMBING THE ISIS, BUT DENY ANY OFFICIAL ALLIANCE.

Again, iff the Bammer = OWG Globalists intend for Iran to be a Co-Superpower, as Principal or One of them in any future OWG ME Union, Persian GUlf Union, West Asia + Mediterranean,etc. not only does Iran need NucWeaps but also a STRONG NATIONAL MILITARY-INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX TO SUPPORT ITS + GLOBIES' GEOPOL/ MILPOL AGENDUM, ESPEC VEE THE USA-NAU + EUROS-EU.

To that end, iff the US doesn't give or sell Iran F-22's + F-35's, etc. Advanced Miltechs, I suspect working samples of same will weirdly-n-mysteriously crash in the region + end up in the good hands of Iran's reverse engineers.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2014-12-04 22:30  

#4  IIRC, the Bammer Admin still desires a unified, centralized, Federalist Iraq - however, as things stand its likely ar best any post-ISIS Iraq will be a SWISS-STYLE GOVT-STATE WID THREE OR MORE AUTONOMOUS "CANTONS".

In the worse case, Iraq will break up into three or more sovereign Nations including but a possible sovereign Shia State likely independent andor dominated by neighboring OWG Co-Superpower Shia Iran.

WHY DO MANY US POLITICOS + AMERIKAN NETTERS ACT, BELIEVE LIKE THE US IS IMMUNE FROM ABOVE???

ASIA-PACIFIC, OR EAST ASIA-PACIFIC, NOT THE US, NATO-EU VERSUS RUSSIA, AS PER THE GLOBALIST AGENDA WILL BE THE CATALYST FOR ANY US BREAKUP OR "CANTONMENT".
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2014-12-04 20:43  

#3  Gut and demoralize the US military. Done

Establish relationships with radical terrorist states. Getting there.

Continue the fundamental change to "America". Ignore the current Constitution. On course.

The New Far Leftist US Democratic party rolls on.
Posted by: Ebbomosh Hupemp2664   2014-12-04 20:17  

#2  Funny, DefSec Hagle inferred the same positives about the Pencilneck regime and got canned.
Posted by: DepotGuy   2014-12-04 11:03  

#1  About on the level of wanting the Soviets to join the war against Japan around 31 July 1945. Guess who's already done most of the work? Why do I read ValJar all over this one?
Posted by: Procopius2k   2014-12-04 09:40  

00:00