You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
The Democratic Party's Civil War Is Here
2014-11-10
Best election assessment I've seen. This is only the first third or so.
[FRONTPAGEMAG] There are really two Democratic parties.

One is the old corrupt party of thieves and crooks. Its politicians, black and white, are the products of political machines. They believe in absolutely nothing. They can go from being Dixiecrats to crying racism, from running on family values to pushing gay marriage and the War on Women.

They will say absolutely anything to get elected.

Cunning, but not bright, they are able campaigners. Reformers underestimate them at their own peril because they are determined to win at all costs.

The other Democratic Party is progressive. Its members are radical leftists working within the system. They are natural technocrats and their agendas are full of big projects. They function as community organizers, radicalizing and transforming neighborhoods, cities, states and even the country.

They want to win, but it's a subset of their bigger agenda. Their goal is to transform the country. If they can do that by winning elections, they'll win them. But if they can't, they'll still follow their agenda.

Sometimes the two Democratic parties blend together really well. Bill Clinton
...former Democratic president of the U.S. Bill was the second U.S. president to be impeached, the first to deny that oral sex was sex, the first to have difficulty with the definition of is...
combined the good ol' boy corruption and radical leftist politics of both parties into one package. The secret to his success was that he understood that most Democrats, voters or politicians, didn't care about his politics, they wanted more practical things. He made sure that his leftist radicalism played second fiddle to their corruption.

Bill Clinton convinced old Dems that he was their man first. Obama stopped pretending to be anything but a hard core progressive.

The 2014 election was a collision course between the two Democratic parties. The aides and staffers spilling dirt into the pages of the New York Times
...which still proudly displays Walter Duranty's Pulitzer prize...
, the Washington Post and Politico reveal that the crackup had been coming for some time now. Now the two Democratic parties are coming apart.

Reid is blaming Obama. The White House is blaming Reid. This isn't just a showdown between two arrogant men. It's a battle between two ideas of what the Democratic Party should be.
Posted by:Fred

#7  Pace Kissinger, it's a pity they both can't lose.
Posted by: charger   2014-11-10 21:17  

#6  With the difference that tyhe RINOS don't want America to sink below the waves.
Posted by: JFM   2014-11-10 13:58  

#5  Repubican Civil War as described by NYT via Breitbart
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2014-11-10 11:40  

#4  Sounds kinda like the difference between the RINOs and the Tea Party.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2014-11-10 11:25  

#3  Let them thin their own herd. Should they go down losing power, we can effect real justice, which will consist of millions of former government employees and welfare recipients forced to choose between hard manual labor with anxiety about being fired at a much lower income than they have now, or starving.

Not soon enough.
Posted by: no mo uro   2014-11-10 08:49  

#2  ed in Texas, inhibit???? Hell, we should be making sure they don't run out of ammo!!
Posted by: AlanC   2014-11-10 08:33  

#1  So, let's not do anything to inhibit the circular firing squad.
Posted by: ed in texas   2014-11-10 07:50  

00:00