Submit your comments on this article | |||
Home Front: WoT | |||
To Destroy Islamic State, US Must Tackle Syria | |||
2014-09-07 | |||
That, however, is far more complicated. If it launches ![]() Pencilneckal-Assad Horror of Homs... , whose removal the West has actively sought the past three years. Uprooting the Islamic State group, which has seized roughly a third of Syria and Iraq, may potentially open the way for the Syrian army to fill the vacuum. The alternative would be to finally get serious about arming the mainstream Western-backed rebels fighting to topple Assad. But there is a reason the administration of President Barack Obama Jedi mind meld... has been deeply reluctant to throw its weight behind them. The relatively moderate rebel factions fighting in Syria are in tatters. There are no secular groups, and the strongest factions are Islamic groups, many of which work with al-Qaeda's official branch in Syria, the Nusra Front. The Nusra Front, which has somewhat dropped from international headlines
It and other rebels recently seized the Quneitra border crossing between Syria and Israel's Golan Heights, taking 45 United Nations ...a lucrative dumping ground for the relatives of dictators and party hacks... peacekeepers hostage. It was also among a group of holy warriors that recently overran a Lebanese border town and is holding several Lebanese soldiers and coppers captive. While the US and its allies are now arming Kurdish peshmerga fighters in Iraq against the Islamic State group, Syrian rebels complain they are largely on their own, battling both the holy warriors and the tyranny of Assad. The Syrian opposition and many Syria observers are convinced that the rapid rise of the Islamic State group is a result of the US having let the Syrian conflict fester for so long. Obama kicked up a storm of criticism late last month when he said "we don't have a strategy yet" for dealing with the Islamic State group in Syria. "It is very important from my perspective that when we send our pilots in to do a job, that we know that this is a mission that's going to work, that we're very clear on what our objectives are, what our targets are," Obama said. His statement epitomizes the caution that many say has been at the heart of US foreign policy on Syria for the past three years. For better or for worse, Obama has avoided wading into the Syria mud, resisting pressure to directly arm the rebels in part because of fears the weapons would only end up in bully boys' hands. Last year, the US threatened to bomb Assad's forces following a deadly chemical weapons attack blamed on his government. It backed away at the last minute. Though he had to give up his chemical weapons stockpile, an emboldened Assad made significant advances against outgunned rebels in key areas, particularly around the capital, Damascus. Members of the B.O. regime have said they recognize the need to address the Syrian side of the equation. While meeting with NATO ...the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. It's headquartered in Belgium. That sez it all.... foreign and defense ministers on possible action in Iraq, US Secretary of State John F. I was in Vietnam, you knowKerry Former Senator-for-Life from Massachussetts, self-defined war hero, speaker of French, owner of a lucky hat,conqueror of Cambodia, and current Secretary of State... said there are obviously "implications about Syria in this." A senior B.O. regime official said Thursday that the US wanted to establish a credible ground force in Syria by training more moderate rebels before taking military action there. The US signaled back in June that it hopes to enlist moderate Syrian opposition fighters in the battle against bully boy bully boys. Obama sent Congress a $500 million request for a Pentagon-run program that would significantly expand previous covert efforts to support rebels. The request is still pending. Still, such a program faces the same questions hanging over US policy the past three years -- how to distinguish "moderate" rebels from others in an increasingly radical landscape and how to ensure weapons only reach those groups. Airstrikes alone would likely do little to truly defeat the Islamic State if there is no force on the ground to seize territory as the snuffies retreat. Western leaders have categorically rejected the notion of partnering up with Assad, whom they accuse of committing war crimes on his own people. So that means greater coordination with rebel factions. "Unless such groups are able to capitalize on any | |||
Posted by:trailing wife |
#7 That, however, is far more complicated No its not, it is very simple. They all want us dead, every leader in Syria wants to see the US fall. We have to get over our 10=960's everyone needs a hug crap and burn their cities to the ground. |
Posted by: 49 Pan 2014-09-07 22:23 |
#6 Think Berlin bombing, think fire bombing Tokyo, think Leipzig, for goodness sakes, will someone teach our leaders about total war??? Who gives a damn about the people of Syria? We are so worried about the poor little muzzies in muzzieland that we are willing to allow out nation to fall as to not hurt one puppy. |
Posted by: 49 Pan 2014-09-07 22:21 |
#5 'Moderate' rebels = 'Good' Nazis? (With apologies to Godwin's law) |
Posted by: borgboy 2014-09-07 17:31 |
#4 Methinks Washington spends too much time trying to distinguish between various terrorist groups by asking questions such as "Is ISIS more evil than AQ, etc?" Seems like a waste of time. The terrorists may distinguish between Sunni and Shia but they all seem to be united in their hatred of the West--particularly Israel and the U.S. |
Posted by: JohnQC 2014-09-07 10:59 |
#3 get serious about arming the mainstream Western-backed rebels Both of them? I mean, seriously, is there any group in Syria that isn't predominantly a Muzzie terror group? |
Posted by: AlanC 2014-09-07 09:10 |
#2 I think they should be allowed to fight it out a bit longer. |
Posted by: BernardZ 2014-09-07 04:31 |
#1 A senior B.O. regime official said Thursday that the US wanted to establish a credible ground force in Syria by training more moderate rebels before taking military action there. They don't learn, do they? |
Posted by: g(r)omgoru 2014-09-07 02:31 |