You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Why The F-35 Has Turned Into A Trillion-Dollar Fiasco
2014-08-19
The Pentagon has stuck with the F-35 Lightning Joint Strike Fighter program despite dozens of technical problems and delays, strategic concerns, and massive cost overruns that have nearly doubled the initial cost estimate, raising the cost of building the planes to around $400 billion with a lifetime cost of up to $1.5 trillion.

One reason why the project has become such a boondoggle is that many states and countries are significantly invested in the plane, relying on its production for income and jobs.

Every U.S. state but Alaska, Hawaii, Nebraska, and Wyoming has economic ties to the F-35, with 18 states counting on the project for $100 million or more in economic activity, according to primary contractor Lockheed Martin. All told, the project is supposedly responsible for 32,500 jobs in the U.S. Globally, another nine countries have major ties to the F-35.

One way or another, America's multirole fifth generation fighter is coming -- though it was most recently delayed to September 2017.
I sometimes wonder how WWII would have turned out had today's pols been making the decision.
Posted by:gorb

#4  Thank goodness Champ had the foresight to cut the F-22 so we'd have room in the budget for this.
Posted by: Mike N.   2014-08-19 20:43  

#3  The F-35 is a fine plane. It is new and has problems to sort out. It will do a good job for America and our allies. Because it is good, it is not cheap to build, fly, or maintain.

Some design decisions, single engine and sorta-super-cruise have left it with some limitations in range and performance.

I would personally have chosen updates to the proven two engine F-15 and F-18 designs. But the costs would have been only about half as much, and their performance would not be as good as the mature F-35 aircraft will be.

Finally, there is a good strategic reason to stretch these programs out over many years. In WWII (and WWI) we built up huge pools of labor and capital investments to make war equipment for just a few years and then let it all go. The current approach maintains a small but consistent industrial base. This is more economically efficient and thus cheaper overall. So if we are not about to loose a war due to lack of aircraft, which is indeed the case now, this is the right investment strategy building a fine aircraft.
Posted by: rammer   2014-08-19 20:37  

#2  A post-Cold War, post-911 "light fighter" that makes all the controversial costs-n-issues, etc. of the original Cold War F-16, F-14, F-15, + F-18 look petty or miniscule by comparison.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2014-08-19 20:15  

#1  One day DoD will only be able to afford one super aircraft with all the bells and whistles. The Air Force and Navy will fly it on alternating days. The Marine Corps will get it on February 29th.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2014-08-19 17:53  

00:00