You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Lurid Crime Tales-
Judge Demands Answers After IRS Contradicts Sworn Testimony
2014-08-16
[DAILYCALLER] U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan Thursday ordered the Internal Revenue Service to come up with new answers after IRS employees contradicted sworn testimony about damage to Lois Lerner
...the former head of the IRS Exempt Unit. She is a past president of the Council on Governmental Ethics Laws and a member of the Massachussetts bar. She was held in contempt of Congress for her role in the IRS targeting of regime political enemies and refusing to testify. The dog ate her computer's hard drive with all her emails on it...
's hard drive.

Sullivan ruled that "the IRS is hereby ORDERED to file a sworn Declaration, by an official with the authority to speak under oath for the Agency, by no later than August 22, 2014″ on four issues: the IRS' attempted recovery of Lerner's lost emails after her computer allegedly crashed, bar codes that could have been on the hard drive, IRS policies on hard drive destruction, and information about an outside vendor who worked on IRS hard drives.

Recent documents from nonprofit group Judicial Watch's Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the IRS, which Sullivan is presiding over, showed that IRS technology officials contradicted sworn testimony about damage to Lerner's hard drive.

Aaron Signor, an IRS technician that looked at Lerner's hard drive in June 2011, said in IRS court filings that he saw no damage to the drive before sending it off to another IRS technician, leading some in the media to suggest that the lost emails scandal is basically over. But Signor's statement, issued in response to the Judicial Watch lawsuit, does not jibe with sworn congressional testimony.

The Daily Caller reported that Lerner's hard drive was "scratched" and then "shredded," according to a court filing the IRS made to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Posted by:Fred

#2  It's no surprise that the techie's testimony doesn't jibe with that of his bosses.
Posted by: Abu Uluque   2014-08-16 13:57  

#1  If the judge would jug a few of these people for contempt/obstruction of justice/destruction of evidence at this time, it might be motivating for them and others in the IRS who have knowledge of what was going on. If they can be caught in a lie, get them for perjury. Of course, these a-holes might be such ideologues that they might fall of their swords. Federal judges have considerable power. You don't want to play games with them. They can make you sorry.
Posted by: JohnQC   2014-08-16 12:43  

00:00