You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Caucasus/Russia/Central Asia
June 22nd, 1944, 70 years ago: Operation Bagration
2014-06-22


I don't have much to say about the anniversary of arguably the greatest strategic defeat suffered by Hitler in WWII. The start date of Operation Bagration, otherwise known as the Battle for Western Belorussia was in 1944 on this date. Starting then and ending in early August, the Soviet Red Army immolated 300,000 German soldiers and wiped 30 German divisions off the situation maps, taking advantage of a strategic deception that kept the bulk of Germany's hard experienced, mobile forces in the south to defend against what the German General Staff thought was Stalin's next move.

When the offensive began, Hitler did Stalin a tremendous favor by tying German forces down to specific locations and forbidding local commanders from switching forces. This long-standing defensive practice of switching forces from one threatened sector to another, tying those forces to roads that were denied the Red Army, and refined by the German commander's experience in the field, could have slowed the Red Army down, but ultimately, it probably would not have yielded anything other than yet another tactical win, as the German Army was forced back into central Europe.

For years during the Cold War we heard about the tremendous victory of the Red Army against the German Army. Soviet top commanders constantly celebrated this very day. But after the walls came tumbling down a truth emerged: the German Army also took a pretty good sized chunk out of the Red Army even with the strategic blunder committed by Hitler.

The western Allies had opened the second front just a few weeks earlier, as the Red Army was planning its moves in the first front. Operation Bagration ultimately found the Red Army near the eastern border of Greater Germany, where they would remain until January 12th, 1945.

--badanov
Posted by:badanov

#2  Just as a lot of Western histories concentrate to the point of ignoring the great battles of the East, the Eastern histories like wise ignore the contributions of the West. One among them was the war of attrition in the air battle for Berlin, begun in February, the allied air arms forced the Luftwaffe to defend the capital. That meant the fronts had to be stripped of air support that would otherwise be available. The allies suffered significant losses but could make them up. The Germans suffered as well, but couldn't. From the allied perspective it was to remove the Luftwaffe as the threat to the Normandy landings, but it has contributory effects elsewhere. Tactical air support was often critical to American success as it had been to the Germans in 1940. Think 'clear weather prayer' and Bastogne. It provided that edge to make up for less than tactical or operational brilliance. Had the Luftwaffe not been molested and in full force to be employed, how more difficult would have thing been on the Eastern Front.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2014-06-22 08:48  

#1  The enomity of it all still brings awe to one'senses. Glantz has written brutally true descriptive articles about the shattering of surrrounded German troops. Troops that were denied all mobility by their tyrant leader.
Posted by: borgboy   2014-06-22 00:26  

00:00