You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Republican Congresscritter Dragging His Feet on Benghazi Has Conflict of Interest
2014-04-10
Congressman Mike Rogers, R-Mich., as Chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, is charged with investigating the adequacy of security at the Benghazi compound prior to the Sept. 11, 2012 terrorist attack.

His wife, Kristi Clemens Rogers was the president and the CEO of the company [Aegis LLC] that was contracted by the State Department to provide that security. ...
Posted by:Uncle Phester

#15  Nice catch 3dc. Anyone care to opine that Ms. Rogers wasn't a well targeted recruitment and hire by Aegis LLC ?
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-04-10 22:02  

#14  C-Span video on Kristi Rogers from 2010
Posted by: 3dc   2014-04-10 21:19  

#13   Better a small, little know footprint like Blue Mountain.

I thought about that, especially given that the Benghazi consulate was officially designated in the Congressional report as a "temporary consulate". That in itself is interesting - the ambassador was ostensibly in town to dedicate a new computer/media area at that consulate for use by Libyan nationals. Not exactly something that's usually added to a temporary facility. Then again, it is "government."

My curiosity peaked when the Blue Mountain Program Manager was reported to have rather abruptly departed Benghazi and returned to London

Also interesting are reports that the program manager had no experience with facility security; his background was in the personal-protection/bodyguard field.

As I said, we might not ever know, especially if Blue Mountain signed an NDA with the UK-based Aegis.
Posted by: Pappy   2014-04-10 18:20  

#12  Moral of the story: Corruption is non-partisan and infectious?
Posted by: JohnQC   2014-04-10 16:10  

#11  Your "conjecture" is probably closer to the facts than may be realized. Having a major player like Aegis on the ground in Benghazi would have instantly created a flag. Better a small, little know footprint like Blue Mountain.

My curiosity peaked when the Blue Mountain Program Manager was reported to have rather abruptly departed Benghazi and returned to London. As we have noted here on several occasions, little interest was paid to the Blue Mountain piece by investigators or committees. We may now know why.

Contributing factors to the Blue Mountain Program Manger's departure might have been a pending arms deal cock-up, and a need to clear the drop zone prior to everything going seriously to hell. Ambassador Steven's hapless appearance in Benghazi may have been a last ditch attempt at saving the project.

The involvement of dodgy characters like old Sandline International CEO Lt. Col. Tim Spicer and Aegis Defense Services, should provide an alert whenever they appear. It has been said in some circles, that "where Tim goes, trouble generally follows."

A complete laying of Benghazi cards on the table may have rather inconvenient consequences for not only the current regime, but our Albion cousins as well.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-04-10 15:31  

#10  Blue Mountain did not have experience in protecting diplomatic facilities. Based on info provided by the foreign diplo community in Benghazi, there was surprise at Blue Mountain getting the contract; normally it's awarded more experienced firms, especially given the situation on the ground.

Personal conjecture:

The Benghazi consulate contract was short term, too 'small', a stand-alone contract (i.e., separate from the large contract Aegis had,) or a combination thereof. It could have been awarded directly to Blue Mountain (based on any or some the above factors.)

Or - and more likely, the contract was awarded to Aegis LLC and then sub-contracted, something that is done frequently. The reason for subcontracting could also have been any or some of the above factors.

In any case, Blue Mountain got the job, either by contract or sub-contract. Although not having experience in diplomatic facility security, it's not unheard of for a firm to bid on a contract or subcontract(breaking even or at a slight loss,) hoping to build a "record of performance" if it's awarded. Connections could have played a part.

Apparently Blue Mountain pulled its employee(s) prior to the attack. If a contractor breaks off a contract, it's because the contracting body (State Department in this case) did not hold up its end of the work-performance statement/contract, Aegis did not hold up its end as contractor administrator, a combination of the two, or Blue Mountain concluded that the risk to its personnel or that performing the work the contract itself required was untenable and was willing to deal with the legal after-effects.

The other possibility was that Blue Mountain was ordered off. The possibles for that are contract non-performance, contract dispute, cancellation of the contract, or being told to go on hiatus.

It's likely we won't know, especially if Blue Mountain signed an NDA (non-disclosure agreement) for whatever reason.

Curious, in any case.
Posted by: Pappy   2014-04-10 13:53  

#9  Obviously just being a Republican is not enough. It has to be the right kind of Republican. Otherwise all you ever get is more of the same.
Posted by: Iblis   2014-04-10 12:40  

#8  Certainly explains why nothing has been forthcoming. Both sides anxiously nibbling off the same custard tart.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-04-10 11:16  

#7  Someone smarter than I said that the Republicans and the Democrats ere just two wings of the same turkey.
Posted by: SR-71   2014-04-10 10:20  

#6  Well Tarzan, appears we've layed down with the honds and come up with the fleas.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-04-10 09:56  

#5  You know, if I was a cynical person, I might be inclined to suspect that our entire government is a cesspool of corruption and thievery. Sort of like a criminal syndicate.

But, can't be, too many checks and balances. Right?
Posted by: Tarzan Gurly-Brown   2014-04-10 09:45  

#4  Former FBI agent and Congressman Mike Rogers calls CISPA opponents, "14 year olds in the basement."

The controversial Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act (CISPA) just passed the U.S. House, and will now head to the upper Senate chamber for further deliberation.

CISPA will allow private sector firms to search personal and sensitive user data of ordinary U.S. residents to identify "threat information," which can then be shared with other opt-in firms and the U.S. government — without the need for a court-ordered warrant.

Link
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-04-10 09:14  

#3  Relevant link to the #2.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-04-10 04:22  

#2  Appears to be getting dirtier by the hour. Aegis LLC has, shall we say, a rather coloured history as a Private Military Company [PMC] in Africa and elsewhere. They also have decades long, deeply rooted contacts in the UK defense establishment and yes, you guesse it, Blue Mountain Security.

And yes, we did recently have billions of USD turn up missing at the State Department. Something tells me the Benghazi investigation may soon be slowing to a crawl.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-04-10 04:20  

#1  test
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-04-10 04:16  

00:00