You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine-Jordan
John Kerry's not-so-realistic foreign policy: Abdur Rahman Chowdhury
2014-04-04
[Pak Daily Times] President B.O. raised passions during his campaign for the presidency in 2008. The US believed he would revitalise the economy, bring ongoing wars to a halt, advance diplomacy over bellicosity in settling international disputes and restore human rights
...which are often intentionally defined so widely as to be meaningless...
. The president charmed the Arabs when he said in Cairo in June 2009, "America's strong bonds with Israel are well known. They are based upon cultural and historical ties, and the recognition that the aspiration for a Jewish homeland is rooted in a tragic history that cannot be denied. On the other hand, it is also undeniable that the Paleostinian people -- Mohammedans and Christians -- have suffered in pursuit of a homeland. For more than 60 years they have endured the pain of dislocation. They endure the daily humiliations -- large and small -- that come with occupation. So let there be no doubt: the situation for the Paleostinian people is intolerable. America will not turn our backs on the legitimate Paleostinian aspiration for dignity, opportunity and a state of their own...The United States does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements." In Europe, the president pledged the US would work in concert with European allies and would listen to them. This created an impression that US hegemony would be replaced by an 'era of discourse'.

Though troops were brought home from Iraq, no safeguards were put in place prior to withdrawal. Consequently, mayhem still continues. No peace initiative was formulated for the Israel-Paleostinian conflict -- George Mitchell remained a lame duck peace envoy with no agenda to pursue. The Arab Spring began in mid-2012 and swept away dictators in Tunisia, Egypt and Libya. The US failed to take a position at the right time. It was hesitant about which side to embrace. The dictators were their long time friends while there was an emerging force on the streets asking for a pluralistic society. When the turn came for Syria, the US administration again faltered. Supporting the Assad regime was not an option but the opposition was fragmented and even embraced bully boys. Lack of a timely decision brought death to over 100,000 people and displacement to a million. Iran was suspected to have been in pursuit of nuclear capability. Tehran repeatedly claimed it was pursuing nuclear energy for peaceful development purposes but the US preferred sanctions over dialogue and thus stalemate persisted. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
Posted by:Fred

#2  It will indeed starin "Washington-Moscow realtions" but won't effecuate any return of the Crimea back to Ukraine.

Any Each + All anti-Russian locals in the Region will have to accept what has happened whether they like it or not.

AGAIN, IMO THE FOCII OF THE KERRY-LAVROV TALKS AS PER THE CRIMEA IS NOTSOMUCH ABOUT RETURNING THE CRIMEA TO SOVEREIGN UKRAINE BUT HOW THE US-NATO/EU + RUSSIA CAN BEST COOPERATE + "SHARE" THE REMNANT OF UKRAINE PROPER WIDOUT THE NOW-RUSSIAN CRIMEA.

* GROONG > [AntiWar] NATO PLANS MILITARY BUILDUP IN THE CAUCASUS.

"Entrenchement" of the Judeo-Christian Bloc.

versus

* WAFF > [Today'S Zaman]RUSSIA WARNS TURKEY, US ON AMERICAN WARSHIPS IN THE BLACK SEA.

Russia = FM Sergei Lavrov is claiming that the transit + prolonged stay of USN surface warships expressly violates terms of the Montreaux Convention.

* CHINESE MILITARY FORUM > RUSSIA MAY DENY NATO AGHAN TRANSIT [To-n-From] IN RETALIATION [NATO suspension of formal cooper wid Russia]: RUSSIAN LEGISLATOR.

---------------

What is SecState JAAWHN + OBAMA facing agz RUSSIA vee the Crimea Crisis?

Just look at CHINA in East Asia-Pacific...

* As per BHARAT RAKSHAK + NIGHTWATCH =...
> China will NOT accept any negotiations where its DE FACTO ["Sole"]SOVEREIGNTY over disputed islands is NOT recognized from the beginning of talks.
> China will blame the PHIL [Japan?], + ONLY THE PHIL [Japan?], FOR ANY LOSS OF LIFE OR PROPERTY, ETC. IFF ANY SHOOTOUT OCCURS BETWEEN OPPOSING MIL OR SECURITY FORCES.
> China makes it clear that it, NOT THE PHIL [Japan?], is the one acting under serious self-restraint or military restraint in these ongoing disputes, in the name of peace + diplomacy which China will claim the PHIL[Japan?] doesn't want nor care for.

ALL THE ABOVE + OBAMA'S LOVE OF "RED LINES" = RUSSIA KEEPS THE CRIME, ETAL. = CHINA WILL KEEP TAIWAN + EAST CHINA SEA + SOUTH CHINA SEA, ETAL.

GUAM-WESTPAC? HAWAII? ALASKA? 1/2-OR-MORE OF CONUS-NORAM?
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2014-04-04 23:18  

#1  The boys throw rocks in jest, but the frogs die in earnest.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2014-04-04 05:22  

00:00