You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Study: Curbing Pesticides Will Slash Wheat Yields
2014-03-22
[An Nahar] La Belle France's winter wheat harvest could shrink by over a tenth if farmers meet targets to halve pesticide use, said a study Thursday highlighting the challenge of feeding Earth's growing population.

The estimates come from field trials where scientists compared yields to cuts in pesticide use.

Extrapolated for the country as a whole, halving pesticide use could mean a decline in winter wheat production of two to three million tonnes per year, the researchers said. This amounts to a reduction of five to 13 percent of national production of winter wheat, and 15 percent of French wheat exports.

Halving pesticide use "may not be profitable for farmers", the team wrote in the Nature journal Scientific Reports.

With projections of an extra two billion mouths to feed by 2050 and a shortage of new farmland, increasing crop yield per hectare has never been as urgent.

Pesticides played a crucial role in doubling the average yield of cereal crops worldwide from 1960 to 1990, but their impact on human health and biodiversity have made them controversial. European farmers are encouraged to limit pesticide use, and French environmental policy targets a 50-percent reduction by 2018.

Now researchers have calculated what the impact of such a policy is likely to be.

They used data from 176 experimental farming plots from four sites in La Belle France that compared yields for wheat grown with pesticides, with less pesticides, or with none.

Statistical modelling then estimated a broader scenario for La Belle France.

The country had average wheat yield of 7.11 tonnes per hectare between 2008 and 2012. With a 50 percent pesticide reduction, the yield dropped by 0.4 to 0.9 tonnes per hectare, compared to 2-2.3 tonnes per hectare if pesticides are eliminated altogether, the team found.
Posted by:Fred

#4  Who could object to a teensy 5-13 percent?

Don't know nothing about the economics of farming, but a lot of business only make few percent of sales. Questions:

Does the reduction put a harvest under the break-even point?

Does it change the calculation as to whether to plant wheat or some other crop?
Posted by: SteveS   2014-03-22 22:24  

#3  "Extrapolated for the country as a whole, halving pesticide use could mean a decline in winter wheat production of two to three million tonnes per year, the researchers said. This amounts to a reduction of five to 13 percent of national production of winter wheat, and 15 percent of French wheat exports."

..well, now we have some Goremetrics to track..
Posted by: Uncle Phester   2014-03-22 21:58  

#2  ..just like old unemployment is the new funemployment (but still 'evil' if a Trunk was in the White House).
Posted by: Procopius2k   2014-03-22 17:11  

#1  Cutting pesticides will cut wheat yields.

Cutting wheat yields will lead to starvation. Starvation will lead to reduced population. Reduced population will lead to reduced CO2. Reduced CO2 will lead to reduced global warming.

Ergo, reducing pesticides is a good thing.

/liberal logic
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2014-03-22 13:40  

00:00