You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Kerry Complains Putin Plays By '19th Century' Rules
2014-03-03
"Nyekulturni, that's what it is. Somebody ought to tell him so, too."
[BREITBART] Secretary of State John F. I was in Vietnam, you know Kerry
Former Senator-for-Life from Massachussetts, self-defined war hero, speaker of French, owner of a lucky hat, conqueror of Cambodia, and current Secretary of State...
complained on Sunday's edition of NBC News' Meet the Press that Vladimir Putin
...Second and fourth President of the Russian Federation and the first to remain sober. Putin is credited with bringing political stability and re-establishing something like the rule of law, which occasionally results in somebody dropping dead from polonium poisoning. Under Putin, a new group of business magnates controlling significant swathes of Russia's economy has emerged, all of whom have close personal ties to Putin. The old bunch, without close personal ties to Putin, are in jail or in exile or dead...
was playing by "19th century" rules, not 21st century norms, in his invasion of the Ukranian region of Crimea.

Insisting that "President Putin is not operating from a place of strength here," Kerry lashed out:

You just don't in the 21st century behave in 19th century fashion by invading another country on completely trumped up pre-text, It is serious in terms of sort of the modern manner with which nations are going to resolve problems. There are all kinds of other options still available to Russia. There still are. President B.O. wants to emphasize to the Russians that there are a right set of choices that can still be made to address any concerns they have about Crimea, about their citizens, but you don't choose to invade a country in order to do that.

Meet the Press host David Gregory pressed Kerry about why the B.O. regime did not acknowledge that Russia had invaded the Ukraine on Friday. Kerry did not answer, seemingly incredulous that Russia had ignored contemporary norms.

The trouble is that a "19 century" invasion is still more potent than a 21st century debate. Kerry dodged questions about military options, noting that NATO
...the North Atlantic Treaty Organization. It's headquartered in Belgium. That sez it all....
had issued a "strong statement."
Posted by:Fred

#15  We categorically denounce Livy and his use of 18th Century Rules.
Posted by: Hannibal Barca   2014-03-03 20:35  

#14  Actually the 17th ones, Jawn.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2014-03-03 18:11  

#13  Since everyone knows this behavior is as old as the fellow who was tired of eating lizards and came across a weaker fellow with a garden.

So why throw out 19th century Jawn? Totally forget WWI and WWII? 21st Century is less than 15 years along and there are plenty of examples...like trying to put US Troops in Syria. Hell, Obama campaigned on taking the resources of others forcably and distributing the spoils among his allies.

Jawn, are you making a reference to the mid 19th century Allied Army vs. Russia on accident or on purpose?
Posted by: swksvolFF   2014-03-03 16:16  

#12  Kerry Complains Putin Plays By '19th Century' Rules

Terrible it is that academia did away with (19th Century et al) history and replaced it with 'victim studies'. Otherwise, you might actually understand the 'Rules'.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2014-03-03 15:11  

#11  Well considering the world has been playing by those rules since the stone age and we tried to pretend that they didn't apply anymore... little wonder we are now in the position of Putin having us by our short and curlies.
Posted by: DarthVader   2014-03-03 13:46  

#10  At this site, discover the people who conduct diplomacy, the places where the Department of State engages in diplomacy, ... Diplomacy is Building Bridges.

Sums up J F Kerry in his role as Chief Diplomat... a bridge to nowhere

Posted by: Clyde and Company8091   2014-03-03 12:59  

#9  Is that all you got John F. Kerry?
Posted by: JohnQC   2014-03-03 11:01  

#8  One also wonders how much 'tech stuff' has been compromised by the likes of Snowden as well.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2014-03-03 10:31  

#7  Tech stuff can only go so far and Russkies are good at TSCM and OPSEC.

Plus the "tech stuff" has been focused elsewhere.
Posted by: Pappy   2014-03-03 10:22  

#6  Not since ancient China has a county been led by so many eunuchs
Posted by: Silentbrick   2014-03-03 09:08  

#5  Champ sees USCITS as his threat, not the Russians. His collection efforts are focused internally. He could give a fok what goes on in the Israel, Syria, North Korea, Iran, Ukraine or Crimea. I doubt he could point to the Ukraine on a map with a 5 iron.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-03-03 08:11  

#4  I think we've been basically blind in Russia/FSU since Ames/Hansen. Nobody is going risk working for us. We need HUMIT and doubt we have it. Tech stuff can only go so far and Russkies are good at TSCM and OPSEC. We're flat out being schooled by Vlad.
Posted by: Bangkok Billy   2014-03-03 08:02  

#3  Well Billy, at least we know where the Klingon and NSA strategic Indications and Warnings [I&W] effort is NOT focused. Perhaps we should begin there.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-03-03 07:51  

#2  Hey Jaaaawhn - one side is playing 19th century chess and the other 21st century checkers. You're so flipping smart - you figure which is which.

"strong statement" = WTF do we do now?
Posted by: Bangkok Billy   2014-03-03 07:48  

#1  Personally, I think the choices fall along the lines of either:

1) Obean knew, or

2)

Neither is good.
Posted by: gorb   2014-03-03 01:43  

00:00