You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
Rouhani Says Iran 'Serious' about Talks on Final Nuclear Deal
2014-02-11
[An Nahar] President Hassan Rouhani said Monday Iran is "serious" about negotiations on a comprehensive deal with world powers over its controversial nuclear drive, a week before fresh talks in Vienna.

"Iran is ready to enter negotiations with the P5+1 (group of world powers) to reach a comprehensive and final agreement," Rouhani told Tehran-based foreign diplomats in remarks broadcast live on state television
... and if you can't believe state television who can you believe?
"We are serious in this regard, as we were serious in the first step," he said referring to three rounds of intensive negotiations last year that culminated in a landmark, interim deal on November 24.

Under the accord, Iran agreed to temporarily cap parts of its nuclear activities amid suspicions in the West and Israel that its work masks military objectives despite its repeated denials.

In exchange, it received modest relief from crippling international sanctions as well as a promise by Western powers that new sanctions would not be imposed against it during the six-month duration of the interim deal, which came into effect on January 20.

In the next round of talks, Iran and the P5+1 group -- the United States, Britannia, La Belle France, China and Russia plus Germany -- are to strive for a comprehensive accord that would once and for all solve the decade-long standoff over Iran's nuclear drive.
Posted by:Fred

#2  See also DAILY TIMES.PK > IRAN SAYS ITS NUCLEAR PROGRAMME IS "FOREVER" [+ ever + ever + ...], DISMISSES MILITARY TALK.

* BIGNEWSNETWORK > [Human Events] IS OBAMA SEEKING AN OPENING TO IRAN THE WAY RICHARD NIXON DID WID CHINA?

1970's "Ping-Pong Diplomacy" versus Qaeda Bugaloo.

[US ARMY SOLDIER FORREST GUMP STEALING HIS TEAM CHINA PING-PONG PADDLE here].

VERSUS

* DAILY TIMES.PK > TERRORISTS WID NUCLEAR WEAPONS. PASSING A NUCLEAR BOMB TO A TERRORIST GROUP WOULD BE A FRAUGHT + RISKY UNDERTAKING. A STATE THAT DID THAT WOULD BE WAGING ITS LIFE AGZ HIGH ODDS.

Author hinting at possible Post-2014 Taliban-controlled PAK Govt. = PAK nuclear arsenal???

Unlike any possible post-2014 Taliban-controlled PAK Govt, THE AUTHOR ARGUES THAT TALIBAN RIVAL AL-QAEDA HAS NO FORMAL STATE SPONSOR(S) HENCE NO STATE SOURCE(S) FOR NUCLEAR MATERIALS TO MAKE NUCBOMBS.

"2014" is likely a major reason why the Bammer did what he did vee Baby Assad + Iran - WILL IT WORK, OR WILL THE BAMMER ONLY END UP EMPOWERING THE NUCLEAR GLOBAL JIHAD AGZ THE REST OF THE WORLD???

Lest we fergit, the "GREAT GAME" OF GEOPOL IS CUT-THROAT - THE ROAD TO [GEOPOL] HELL, REDUCTION-OR-DESTRUCTION, IS PAVED WID MYRIAD DIPLOMATIC GOOD INTENTIONS.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2014-02-11 22:39  

#1  We need to look at their international expanionist Islamic ideology too.
Posted by: Paul D   2014-02-11 06:11  

00:00