You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
The smoking ban killed the British pub. This vandalism is Labour's defining legacy
2014-01-22
[BLOGS.TELEGRAPH.CO.UK] Some people believe Labour's defining legacy is Iraq. Others think it is the hunting ban. But the issue which has affected most people and which has damaged the fabric and appearance of British community more than anything else is the loss of the local pub.

The British pub is internationally famous. It is entirely bound with the nation's history. Yet 26 are closing per week -- more than 1,000 a year -- changing the look of the nation. Town and countryside are littered with pub corpses, boarded up and often awaiting permission for conversion to flats or houses.

And it is not as if something else has come along to bring communities together. Instead, people sit in front of their televisions. This terrible process started with the ban on smoking. Labour was warned that it would result in pub closures, but went ahead regardless. The people it was supposed to protect -- the bar staff -- have suffered catastrophic job losses as a result (though this is rarely noticed, as so many bar staff are non-unionised, cash-in-hand foreigners). Labour knew this would happen, as the state of British Columbia in Canada had introduced a similar ban a couple of years earlier and the immediate result had been bar closures and (I have been told) one third of bar jobs lost.
Posted by:Fred

#8  >And it is not as if something else has come along to bring communities together.

It's like that was part of the plan...
Dissent spreads in pubs as people realise "it's not just them that's fed-up".
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2014-01-22 19:15  

#7  California's first year of no in bar smoking resulted in an average of 20% lost employees income. Those bars that could, opened outside seating to beat the law and keep the customers.
Posted by: Mugsy Glink   2014-01-22 17:31  

#6  If you're in a pub in Colorado you can't smoke tobacco but you can smoke a joint...
Posted by: Steve White   2014-01-22 14:35  

#5  Because they are better/smarter than the rest of us.
Posted by: Bobby   2014-01-22 13:28  

#4  Why is it that if a liberal doesn't want to smoke then everyone has to not smoke?
Posted by: JohnQC   2014-01-22 11:08  

#3  The local trick Americans came up with was to redefine the 'bar' as a 'members club', paying one or ten dollars for a year or lifetime membership. As a private club, the establishment was no longer 'public' and subject to most of the local anti-smoking regs any more than a home. Keeping the kids out also took that nanny state means of intrusion into the joint as well.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2014-01-22 09:00  

#2  Well, Islamic nation doesn't needs pubs.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2014-01-22 05:11  

#1  
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-01-22 03:59  

00:00