You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Executed by ... dog
2014-01-03
THE execution of Jang Song Thaek, the No. 2 man in North Korea, took Beijing by surprise and will adversely affect bilateral relations. Beijing's displeasure is expressed through the publication of a detailed account of Jang's brutal execution in Wen Wei Po, its official mouthpiece, in Hong Kong, on Dec 12.

According to the report, unlike previous executions of political prisoners which were carried out by firing squads with machine guns, Jang was stripped naked and thrown into a cage, along with his five closest aides. Then 120 hounds, starved for three days, were allowed to prey on them until they were completely eaten up. This is called "quan jue", or execution by dogs.

The report said the entire process lasted for an hour, with Fat Boy Mr Kim Jong Un, the supreme leader in North Korea, supervising it along with 300 senior officials.

The horrifying report vividly depicted the brutality of the young North Korean leader. The fact that it appeared in a Beijing- controlled newspaper showed that China no longer cares about its relations with the Kim regime.

Two days later, the Global Times, associated with the People's Daily, a Chinese Communist Party organ, followed up with a sternly worded editorial saying that the abrupt political change epitomised the backwardness of the North Korean political system. It warned the Chinese government not to coddle North Korea any longer, saying that the majority of Chinese were extremely disgusted with the Kim regime.

The incendiary story, plus the stern editorial, provided a measure of the extent of Beijing's loathing, which is quite understandable.

In purging a top official known for his close ties with Beijing in such a brutal manner, Pyongyang did not hide its antagonism towards China.

The official litany of Jang's treason implicated China three times. Jang was accused of underselling coal and other natural resources for which China was virtually the sole customer. He was also charged with "selling off the land of Rason economic and trade zone to a foreign country for a period of five decades under the pretext of paying debts". Finally, he was accused of selling precious metals, thus disrupting the country's financial stability. In fact, China purchased some of North Korea's gold reserves several months ago. He was also accused of aiding Chinese businessmen in securing low prices for North Korean goods and commodities.
Now might China curb its dog?
Posted by:Steve White

#23  * INDIAN DEFENCE FORUM > [Space Daily]CHINA, KOREAS IN MODERN CONFLICT OVER ANCIENT [Korean] KINGDOM.

Koguryo versus "post-US", "Mahanist" China.

* DEFENCE FORUM INDIA > RISING TENSIONS BETWEEN CHINA + JAPAN COULD BOIL OVER | IS WORLD WAR 3 ABOUT TO START .... BY ACCIDENT?, MAX HASTINGS ASKS WHETHER ... ... ...|MAIL ONLINE.

* SAME > [Forbes] AFTER YASUKUNI, CHINA CLOSES THE DOOR ON ABE - WHY IS HE SMILING?

ARTIC = ...
> Senkakus/Diaoyu dispute a "kamikaze" which may have had to be CREATED iff it didn't exist.
> US-Japan security aliance incompatible wid that of US-China relations as the US-desired "central organizing principle/base" for East Asia security.
> DEFENSE OF THE "STATUS QUO" MAY aggravate tensions + increase risks of conflict. Fundamental change is needed to Washington's mindset + strategy, OBAMA'S "PIVOT TO ASIA" SHOULD BE REVERSED.

* BHARAT RAKSHAK > ABE WANTS TO CHANGE TEXTBOOKS TO ILLUSTRATE MORE NATIONALISM - THE HINDU.

* WAFF > [Voice of Russia] AIRSEA BATTLE CONCEPT FOR US DEFEAT IN WAR WITH CHINA?

ARTIC = US' internal crisis + dearth of funds seriously jeopardizes its ability to support or maintain its overseas commitments SUCH THAT IT MAY ULTIMATELY "FORCE THE US TO [unilaterally]ACCEPT DEFEAT" IN ANY US-CHINA MIL CONFLICT.

Major US Allies in NE or East Asia may not be able to alter the outcome ...
> SOUTH KOREA = professional + well-trained but its Govt-Military focii is preventing mil attack from NORTH KOREA.
> JAPAN = JSDFS too small in number vee mainland China + PLA despite superb equipment.
> TAIWAN = highly sensitive to political factors, espec Ethnic-Cultural similarities wid Commie China. MAY REMAIN NEUTRAL IN US-CHINA WAR???

RELATED DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > US-CHINA MILITARY CONFLICT COULD LEAD TO NUCLEAR WAR.

US-vs-China, or US-vs-Russia.

* VOICE OF RUSSIA > OBAMA IMPEACHMENT MAY BECOME AREALITY IN 2014: DNC RAISES FEAR IN NEW EMAIL.

Now, now, iff the Dems didn't remove POTUS Clinton for self-admitting his Presidency was illegitimate vee two-time election fraud, what makes them think POTUS Bammer will be removed for publicly lying about Obamacare + other.

AT WORST, OBAMA MAY BE IMPEACHED = "FOUND GUILTY" LIKE CLINTON, BUT THE DEMOCRATIC SENATE WON'T REMOVE HIM FROM OFFICE.

No, IMO any formal impeachment + removal of the Bammer from political office MUST bebased on his very real weakness in Foreign Policy, i.e. violating his own "red lines" + sacrificing US overseas allies + pro-US, Western moderates for the sake of PCorrect-Deniable OWG Globalism.

VIOLATING "RED LINES" IN MIDDLE EAST = SYRIA + IRAN WIN = CHINA WILL WIN IN NE + EAST ASIA.

Posted by: JosephMendiola   2014-01-03 23:01  

#22  Didn't I see this scene in the Vikings?
Posted by: P2Kontheroad   2014-01-03 22:19  

#21  To be honest, these dictator/serial killer types have been around for 6000 years. These days the barbarians wear suits.
Posted by: Omavising Ebbemp9815   2014-01-03 21:09  

#20  I have to agree wid #19 - "Dear Uncle" may had been more loyal to North Korea than spouse "Dear Auntie", but he was still "China's Man" - iff true, this action by Kim would only add to NOKOR's long list of hostile antagonisms agz overlord China, + inspire China to come down harder on the Kim regime.

Looks like other Perts feel similarly ...

* TOPIX > [WNYC] DID KIM JONG-UN FEED HIS UNCLE TO 120 DOGS? BE SKEPTICAL.

* SAME >[Time>com] A DOG OF A STORY? WHY KIM JONG-UN PROBABLY DID NOT FEED HIS UNCLE TO 120 HOUNDS!?

versus

* TOPIX > [Daily Star] AFTER AN EXECUTION, THE KIM DYNASTY'S LAST CHAPTER MAY HAD BEGUN.

NOKOR = Pudgy + Boyz facing a "perfect storm" ...

> "Post-US", "Mahanist" China's "Manifest Destiny" + its demand for strategic access reflecting such via the "First Island Chain" into WESTPAC.
> China's share of NOKOR trade, wid corresponding influence-n-control over NOKOR, likely to increase due to recent Sino-DPRK FTAS.
> China unlikely to support any sort of formal, sovereign inter-Korean Reunification unless its own reunification wid TAIWAN takes place. DITTO AS PER TRUE NOKOR SOVEREIGN INDEPENDENCE???
> Pervasive, lingering starvation in NOKOR proper to go on UNLESS THE COLD WAR-ERA STATUS QUO IS SOMEHOW CHANGED, FINALLY + FOREVER, WID OR WIDOUT RESORT TO INTER-KOREAN ANDOR REGIONAL MILITARY CONFLICT.

As things stand, NOKOR is an UN-ANNEXED CHINESE PROVINCE FACING DE FACTO ANNEXATION BY SAME IN LT, something that NOKOR, SOKOR, US, Japan + Russia don't wanna see happen. BUT YET, IFF THE STATUS QUO DOESN'T CHANGE, CHINA WILL TAKE OVER NOKOR ANYWAY AS THE INDIGENOUS NOKOR PEOPLE STARVE + DIE AWAY LEAVING THE LAND BARE FOR FOREIGN = NON-KOREAN? HABITATION. China is unlikely to favor SOKOR migrants into NOKOR over its own.

SOKOR will all that remains of the ancient Korean homelands, + it will still be at high MilPol risk from China-vs-US [Allied?] geopol competition + rivalry. THE THREAT OF CHINESE-LED OR NUCWAR-LED FINAL ANNIHILATION/DESTRUCTION OF THE KOREAN PEOPLE WILL ALWAYS HANG LIKE THE SWORD OF DAMOCLES OVER SOKOR.

IMO KJU is well-cognizant of the above - iff the Kim Family = "Sovereign" NOKOR is going to go down + be finally taken over by mainland China, HE INTENDS FOR THE REGIME TO GO DOWN TAKING CHINA + "STATUS QUO" + REGIONAL PEACE WID IT. PUDGY WILL FIND A WAY TO INITIATE GREAT POWER WAR IN NE ASIA.

IMO again the WORST-CASE SCENARIO for Pudgy is for a CHINA-JAPAN WAR OVER DISPUTED SENKAKUS/
DIAOYUS TO NOT TAKE PLACE, OR IN ALTERN FOR CHINA TO WIN = "NOT LOSE" IT VEE THE US OR US-ALLIES. Such a war is NOKOR's first real opportunity to remove China from obstructing or preventing inter-Korean reunification, over + besides the Taiwan issue.

* BIGNEWSNETWORK > JAPANESE GOVT WANTS SEA LANES AS PART OF SELF-DEFENSE, i.e. Japan's National Security Strategy.

So does Rising China on its part, as per strategic access for PLA into WESTPAC + SOPAC vee "First Island Chain", WHICH IS WHAT THE SENKAKUS/DIAOYU ISLANDS = EAST CHINA SEA, + SPRATLYS = SOUTH CHINA SEAS, DISPUTES IS REALLY ABOUT.

Yes to ECS + SCS Seafloor/UW Resources, but more to OWG Globalism China's rise to being a Global "Co-Superpower" wid the US, ETAL. + ultimately to take over as World #1.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2014-01-03 21:09  

#19  I question the truthfulness of this. Good reading though.
Posted by: Pheling Squank1415   2014-01-03 19:56  

#18  I dunno - Besoeker #11 deserves at least runner up for "Snark of the Day".
Posted by: Lone Ranger   2014-01-03 19:44  

#17  Just another day at the circus in Caligula's Rome.
Posted by: 3dc   2014-01-03 19:04  

#16  Not only that OldSpook - they would rather sit around and circle-jerk each other while this mad dog develops a missile capable of carrying a nuke *and* of reaching the Continental U.S.

Your right about the video.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2014-01-03 18:24  

#15  ... and Jimmy Carter, Hildabeest, Kerry, and other lefty and State-Dept types would have us negotiate with this madman. Damned fools. They should be forced to sit there, clockwork-orange style and watch the video of the execution (and you know damned well that batsh*t crazy SOB recorded it).

Only one kind of negotiation works with this kind of person:


Posted by: OldSpook   2014-01-03 17:42  

#14  If at first you don't succeed...
Posted by: PBMcL   2014-01-03 17:41  

#13  I thought they did try the Old Exploding Train Trick a while back.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2014-01-03 17:25  

#12  I'll believe the Chinese are serious when they close the oil pipeline valve and Kim's 100 inch flat screen goes dark. Or the train he's on blows up.
Posted by: PBMcL   2014-01-03 17:19  

#11  
I don't suppose there's one chance in hell.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-01-03 16:37  

#10  I understand Pres. Obama is furious. Dogs should not eat man. Man should eat dogs.
Posted by: Eric Jablow   2014-01-03 16:24  

#9  Altrnatively: #3 Evidently the Dennis Rodman Michael Vick sports therapy isn't working.
Posted by: Uncle Phester   2014-01-03 16:01  

#8  Only PETA is smiling after reading this story.
Posted by: Airandee   2014-01-03 12:42  

#7  Fed alive to starving dogs. Best. Evil. Dictator. Ever.
Posted by: regular joe   2014-01-03 12:40  

#6  Well, since dog is a frequent menu item in Korea, I guess turnabout is fair play.
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2014-01-03 12:22  

#5  It could be worse - he could have fed him to 120 starving North Koreans.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2014-01-03 12:20  

#4  Wow - Suet-face really is a psychopath.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2014-01-03 12:04  

#3  Evidently the Dennis Rodman sports therapy isn't working.
Posted by: Besoeker   2014-01-03 11:52  

#2  If the commie lovin &%$* in this country think communism is so great, they should pay attention to this story.
Posted by: JohnQC   2014-01-03 10:13  

#1  In Suet-Face Kim Jong Un's North Korea, dog eats you!

Snark of the Day. Repeat Winner.
Posted by: Frank G   2014-01-03 09:47  

00:00