Submit your comments on this article |
India-Pakistan |
Bottom of the list: Gender report |
2013-10-29 |
![]() The straightforward, though important, reason for a society needing to close the gaps between men and women in the areas of health, education, economics and politics is explained in the very first line of the report: "Countries and companies can be competitive only if they develop, attract and retain the best talent, both male and female." Let half of a country's population lag behind -- enormously behind, in Pakistain's case -- behind the other, male half and the simple fact of the matter is that everyone loses, because society as a whole is unable to achieve its potential. In Pakistain's case, when it comes to systemic interventions by the state to improve the relative standing of women, the problem is less that as a group the country's leadership does not acknowledge the need to improve women's access, opportunities and core entitlements, but that the leadership is all too willing to defer to tradition and antediluvian cultural norms. Consider the area of political empowerment, where Pakistain ranks a less terrifyingly poor 64th. Women in parliament, women in ministerial positions and a female head of state in less than 50 years -- all of this Pakistain has managed to do. But how many parties make it a point to have more women candidates on directly elected seats or groom women for leadership positions? Barring one or two parties, none do. So even where Pakistain appears to be doing well, it isn't really. |
Posted by:Fred |