Submit your comments on this article | |
Economy | |
Senate "Leaders" Flop | |
2013-10-14 | |
![]() Always thinking of The People first, right? Republicans To The Lightbringer? The path is not yet aligned with his wishes, so he remains above the fray. ![]() Soviet-style negotiations - what's mine is mine and what's yours is negotiable. But the shift in focus away from the imminent threat of a default on the U.S. debt sparked outrage among Republicans and alarm among the world's financial leaders, meeting this weekend in Washington. Tired of 'we won - get over it'? Democrats said they objected to a debt-limit plan developed by Sen. Susan Collins because it would permit the cuts to stay in place through March, allowing another round of sequester cuts to hit on Jan. 15. At that point, agency spending for fiscal 2014, which began Oct. 1, would be on track to fall roughly $90 billion lower than Democrats have proposed. And with the fiscal year half over, Democrats would have scant opportunity to renegotiate the numbers, a top priority. Maybe they could just shut 'er down. The sequester cuts are part of $2.1 trillion in agency spending cuts over 10 years included in the Budget Control Act, the measure that raised the debt limit in 2011. Initially, Republicans, also wanted to replace the sequester, particularly the portion that falls on the Pentagon. But since Obama won tax hikes on the wealthy as part of a year-end fight over the "fiscal cliff," McConnell has taken to casting the sequester as a significant GOP victory from which the party cannot retreat. Crisis to crisis to crisis. Never let one go to waste. On Sunday, McConnell issued a statement throwing his support for the first time behind the Collins proposal, calling it a "bipartisan plan" brokered with five other GOP senators and six senators who caucus with Democrats. Harry lose control, did he? "It would reopen the government, prevent a default and maintain the commitment that Congress made to reduce Washington spending through the Budget Control Act -- the law of the land," McConnell said. "It's time for Democrat leaders to take 'yes' for an answer." On Sunday, Sen. Joe Manchin III (W.Va.), one of the Democrats working with Collins, defended the proposal on "Fox News Sunday" as having "a little bit of move for everybody. In a divided government, you can't have it all your way." Looks like a crack in the Dem facade, to me. Many lawmakers are leery of missing the Thursday deadline -- particularly Republicans, who are already getting hammered in "Look, I guess we can get lower in the polls. We're down to blood relatives and paid staffers now," Sen. McCain joked on Face the Nation. "But we've got to turn this around. And the Democrats had better help us." He IS deluded! | |
Posted by:Bobby |
#9 The US Senate hasn't figured out the "pay-off" of the present circumstances... 1 for you, 1 for me... Problem is finding the 'ones'. |
Posted by: Pappy 2013-10-14 20:33 |
#8 D *** NG IT, WASHINGTON WANTS TO MAKE IT ABSOLUTELY POSITIVELY CATEGORICALLY UNDENIABLY ....@ETC. CLEAR TO THE AMERIKAN PEOPLE THE COUNTRY IS N-O-T IN POTENS SERIOUS OR CATASTROPHIC TROUBLE WID ITS DEBT BURDEN, THUS OF COURSE THE RISE OF "BAMMER-CARE". |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2013-10-14 19:57 |
#7 Yuuup. What part of "OBAMA/BAMMERCARE IS A PCORRECT-DENIABLE US DEBT, DEFICIT REDUCTION PLAN" DID WE [once again] NOT UNDERSTAND??? |
Posted by: JosephMendiola 2013-10-14 19:53 |
#6 Older and sick people on the exchanges who are eligible for Federal subsidies (meaning they fall under certain income limits) do well, but small business employers are seeing big premium increases. |
Posted by: Zhang Fei 2013-10-14 18:46 |
#5 ask about the $3500+ deductibles and higher co-pays too |
Posted by: Frank G 2013-10-14 18:32 |
#4 I am hearing of 40% premium hikes due to Obamacare. Anyone else care to share his/her experiences? |
Posted by: Zhang Fei 2013-10-14 18:26 |
#3 With leaders like this who needs an opposition? |
Posted by: Iblis 2013-10-14 15:07 |
#2 The US Senate hasn't figured out the "pay-off" of the present circumstances... 1 for you, 1 for me... |
Posted by: Gerthudion Shaick8610 2013-10-14 13:40 |
#1 If another 3-4 days are needed to negociate the settlement between houses, looks to me like they've essentially missed the "deadline" already. |
Posted by: Besoeker 2013-10-14 10:46 |