You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
India-Pakistan
CII rules out DNA as primary evidence in rape cases
2013-09-24
[Dawn] The Council of Islamic Ideology (CII) on Monday decreed DNA tests unacceptable as primary evidence in rape cases, but said they could be considered as supporting evidence.

Addressing a presser, the Council's chairman, Maulana Muhammad Khan Sherani, said that though DNA testing was a useful and modern technique for supporting evidence, it alone could not be used as primary evidence.

He added that the court of law could decide in light of the DNA test, when it was used with other evidences as a supporting material.

He said the council had also rejected the Women's Protection Act of 2006, saying its provisions were not in line with Islamic injunctions, adding that the Hudood Ordinance dealt with all these offenses.

He said Islam sets procedures to determine crime cases of rape.

Earlier, the Council had convened to review recommendations from its members regarding DNA to be used as evidence in rape cases and possible amendments to Pakistain's blasphemy laws.

It was earlier reported that the council was discussing a proposal to award the death sentence to people making false accusations under the blasphemy law. Allama Tahir Ashrafi was reported as saying that such an amendment would ensure "nobody dares to use religion to settle personal scores".

However,
there's more than one way to skin a cat...
Maulana Sherani in his presser today said that the existing blasphemy laws should not be amended and that the Pakistain Penal Code already had sections which dealt with sentences for those who misused any law of the land. He said that the judge in such cases could resort to those relevant sections to award sentences.

Sherani also said the council had unanimously decided that no member shall comment on any decision of the council's meeting unless the matter was elaborated and explained in a blurb or press briefing by the body.

Replying to a question, he stated that every institution played its own role and the Islamic Ideology Council was performing its job as guiding body and the powers to implement those recommendations did not rest with it.
Posted by:Fred

#4  tw, only the eyewitness testimony of four Muslim males counts, IIRC. And how many rapes take place with that many witnesses, unless the witnesses are also participants?
Posted by: Rambler in Virginia   2013-09-24 22:11  

#3  Well, if old Mo never heard of it how can it be any good?

Not to mention that if it is physical, the djinns can change it without earning. If it is physical or not physical, Allah can changing without notice. Under the circumstances, how can any test upon it be trusted
Posted by: trailing wife   2013-09-24 20:55  

#2  Well, if old Mo never heard of it how can it be any good?
Posted by: Ebbang Uluque6305   2013-09-24 12:28  

#1  "You need 38 witnesses, two ducks and a shrubbery. THEN we'll consider the DNA"
Posted by: Frank G   2013-09-24 12:06  

00:00