You have commented 358 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Western Maryland secessionists seek to sever ties with the liberal Free State
2013-09-09
[Washington Post] The push by 50 western Virginia counties to secede in 1863, forming West Virginia at the height of the Civil War, was led by a charismatic store-clerk-turned-lawyer who famously urged his supporters: "Cut the knot now! Cut it now! Apply the knife."

West Virginia was the last state to break off from another. Now, 150 years later, a 49-year-old information technology consultant wants to apply the knife to Maryland's five western counties. "The people are the sovereign," says Scott Strzelczyk, leader of the fledgling Western Maryland Initiative, and the western sovereigns are fed up with Annapolis's liberal majority, elected by the state's other sovereigns.

"If you think you have a long list of grievances and it's been going on for decades, and you can't get it resolved, ultimately this is what you have to do," says Strzelczyk, who lives in New Windsor, a historic town of 1,400 people in Carroll County. "Otherwise you are trapped."

Strzelczyk's effort is one of several across the country to separate significant portions of states from, as he puts it, "the dominant ruling class." Nearly a dozen northern Colorado counties are the furthest along, with nonbinding referendums set for November ballots. The Upper Peninsula of Michigan is making a move to join with parts of Wisconsin. Northern California counties want to form a state called Jefferson.

Historians, political scientists and the leaders of the movements say secession efforts are being fueled by irreconcilable differences on issues such as gun control, taxes, energy policy, gay marriage and immigration -- all subjects of recent legislative efforts at state and federal levels. The notion of compromise is a non-starter. With secessionists, the term "final straw" comes up a lot.

"You don't have to be a student of the details to know that people are just disgusted with what goes on these days," says Kit Wellman, a political philosopher who studies secession at Washington University in St. Louis. "These people figure they are better off on their own if they could just be with like-minded folks."

Secession is a difficult political fight to win. The U.S. Constitution allows regions to separate only with the approval of the state legislature and Congress, and over the years there have been hundreds of quixotic and unsuccessful efforts, according to Michael J. Trinklein, the author of "Lost States: True Stories of Texlahoma, Transylvania, and Other States that Never Made It."

In the 1950s, Northern California tried to form the state of Shasta, to protect its fresh water. The builders of Mount Rushmore also wanted it to sit in a new state: Absaroka, a reference to a subrange of the Rocky Mountains. Eastern Shore residents pushed for the state of Chesapeake in the 1970s to retain tourist tax dollars.

What's different now is how the secession efforts illuminate a hard truth about the country: The rural-urban divide is increasingly a point of political conflict. The population boom in urban areas such as Baltimore and the Maryland suburbs near the District, the Boulder-Denver areas in Colorado, and in Detroit have filled state legislatures with liberal policymakers pushing progressive agendas out of sync with rural residents, who feel increasingly isolated and marginalized.
Posted by:Fred

#10  The West Virginia split was, shall we say, an interesting 'interpretation' given the historical setting, but has been allowed to stand.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2013-09-09 22:10  

#9  consent of States/Congress would be required if what I read earlier today is true. It referenced the West VA split process
Posted by: Frank G   2013-09-09 21:14  

#8  Pretty sure the constitution doesn't allow creating new states out of existing states.
Posted by: Hellfish   2013-09-09 21:00  

#7  ..yes, Joe, but still one of 57 states.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2013-09-09 20:18  

#6  And the Republic of NORTH COLORADO???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-09-09 19:46  

#5  Parts of Colorado are actually voting on a seccession measure this November. And if it makes sense to form a new state, then why not create a new country? Texas -- I'm looking at you.
Posted by: Elmearong Gurly-Brown5896   2013-09-09 15:50  

#4  The libs will start doing what other Socialist states do. Take over the farms.
Posted by: Beldar Glineter4775   2013-09-09 15:13  

#3  PK2 - Exactly. Voter ID is so noxious to the left because if most of your urban voting center consists of not-eligible-to-vote types who moved to the city for the welfare bennies, well, that's just no fun, is it?
Posted by: M. Murcek   2013-09-09 12:22  

#2  article is from the WaPo

the WaPo is one of the big drivers of the leftist culture in the MD and VA suburbs of DC

Posted by: lord garth   2013-09-09 11:43  

#1  The basics in most of this is urban vs everyone else. It doesn't matter if your metropolis is actually a positive creator of wealth via resources. If you have enough votes you can pillage the countryside and impose your 'culture' on the sharecroppers masses while living off of the product of their labors (food, energy, etc).
Posted by: Procopius2k   2013-09-09 11:42  

00:00