You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
A War the Pentagon Doesn't Want
2013-09-08
[WashingtonPost] They are embarrassed to be associated with the amateurism of the Obama administration's attempts to craft a plan that makes strategic sense.
Is there a plan? A plan that doesn't have "... VICTORY!!" as the middle steps?
None of the White House staff has any experience in war or understands it. So far, at least, this path to war violates every principle of war, including the element of surprise, achieving mass and having a clearly defined and obtainable objective.

They are repelled by the hypocrisy of a media blitz that warns against the return of Hitlerism but privately acknowledges that the motive for risking American lives is our "responsibility to protect" the world's innocents. Prospective U.S. action in Syria is not about threats to American security. The U.S. military's civilian masters privately are proud that they are motivated by guilt over slaughters in Rwanda, Sudan and Kosovo and not by any systemic threat to our country.
That kind of guilt feels good. It's how one knows oneself to be ever so superior to those oafs who don't feel it.
They are outraged by the fact that what may happen is an act of war and a willingness to risk American lives to make up for a slip of the tongue about "red lines." These acts would be for retribution and to restore the reputation of a president. Our serving professionals make the point that killing more Syrians won't deter Iranian resolve to confront us. The Iranians have already gotten the message.

They are tired of wannabe soldiers who remain enamored of the lure of bloodless machine warfare. "Look," one told me, "if you want to end this decisively, send in the troops and let them defeat the Syrian army. If the nation doesn't think Syria is worth serious commitment, then leave them alone." But they also warn that Syria is not Libya or Serbia. Perhaps the United States has become too used to fighting third-rate armies. As the Israelis learned in 1973, the Syrians are tough and mean-spirited killers with nothing to lose.
The Israelis still won. But for the Israelis, the power to unleash the hounds of war is not an aphrodisiac.
Robert H. Scales, a retired Army major general, is a former commandant of the U.S. Army War College.
Posted by:GolfBravoUSMC

#3  The Generals + Admirals know the score - Baby Assad is effective at suppressing Radical Islam + related Hard Boyz.

Once he's gone, SYRIA = LIBYA = post-2014 PAKISTAN = the various autonomous andor independent MilTerr Groups will have STRATEGIC ACCESS, IFF NOT OVERT POLITICAL-LEGAL CONTROL, OF NUKES + WMDS [NBC-CBRNE]. THEY WILL BE THE GOVT-STATE = NEW ESTABLISHMENT.
Posted by: J0sephMendiola   2013-09-08 19:59  

#2  ....'soeker, am sure you are correct. I know Dempsey can sing, but doubt he can dance....
Posted by: Uncle Phester   2013-09-08 16:55  

#1  If Dempsey had anything hanging, he'd resign tomorrow morning. He has to know he's history and under the bus once this crap is over.
Posted by: Besoeker   2013-09-08 11:43  

00:00