You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
U.S., Brit military leaders to discuss Syria
2013-08-25
[OMANOBSERVER] Top military officials from the United States, Britannia and several countries are to meet in Amman this week to discuss the situation in Syria, the Jordanian state news agency reports. They are to discuss the fallout of alleged chemical weapons use near the Syrian capital, Damascus, Jordanian sources said. US Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Martin Dempsey is to attend the meeting, which is also set to include the participation of top military brass from La Belle France, Turkey, Russia, Italia, Canada and Turkey. US Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel strongly suggested the Pentagon was moving forces into place, even as President Barack Obama
They get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them...
voiced caution. Obama has said Washington must be wary of costly and difficult foreign interventions, as calls mount for action against the Syria over alleged chemical warfare.

US commanders have nevertheless prepared a range of "options" for Obama if he chooses to proceed with military strikes against Damascus, Hagel told news hounds. "The Defense Department has a responsibility to provide the president with options for all contingencies," Hagel said. "And that requires positioning our forces, positioning our assets to be able to carry out different options -- whatever the president might choose."

But Hagel declined to provide any details on the deployment of US ships, aircraft or troops, as the B.O. regime reportedly contemplated cruise missile strikes in Syria.
Posted by:Fred

#3  * WORLD NEWS > [Irish Times] US REPOSITIONS NAVAL FORCE, BUT STILL NO DECISION ON SYRIA STRIKE.

Bammer response "Full of Sound + Fury, signifying nothing"???

* GLOBAL TIMES > OPINION: NO CURRENT SYRIA OPTION LOOKS POSITIVE FOR OBAMA.

IMO Artic better read, CHINA + PLA ARE WATCHING THE BAMMER'S ACTIONS, OR LACK OF SAME???

VERSUS

* DEFENCE/PK.FORUMS > VIDEO: OBAMA HAS "NO CHOICE" ON US INTERVENTION IN SYRIA - TELEGRAPH.

He has to, or else can kiss US Superpower = International credibility + his POTUS LEGACY goodbye???

* SAME, HUFFPO > [Foreign Policy] TIME TO PIVOT US FOREIGN POLICY TO IRAN | SARWAR KASHMERI.

Read, PEACE, RAPPROCHEMENT WID IRAN = NO SYRIA STRIKE OR ANY MILSTRIKE ON MUSLIM COUNTRIES BY THE US.

IOW, Baby Assad must win.

RELATED DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > [Iran rival] SAUDI ARABIA WILL FAIL TO ROLL BACK "ARAB SPRING" IN EGYPT + ELSEWHERE.

versus

* DEFENCE.PK/FORUMS > IRAN GIVES OWN "RED LINE" TO US OVER SYRIA STRIKE.

Third anti-US "red line" imposed on the US by Iran since June.

* SAME > NYT SUPPORTS BEST US STRATEGY IS TO IGNITE [region-wide]SHIA-SUNNI WAR.

Only other "acceptable" alternatives for the US is ...

> PROLONGED STALEMATE IN SYRIA PROPER = where Assad + Rebels + Foreign Militant Groups in Syria fight + destroy each other.
> FULL-SCALE US OR US-LED GROUND INVASION, to remove Assad Regime once + for all.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-08-25 23:45  

#2  "The headlines are bad, lets wag the dog"?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2013-08-25 08:11  

#1  Strongly worded statement in 4,3,2......

Triple Secret Probation in the works.
Posted by: Procopius2k   2013-08-25 07:21  

00:00