You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Science & Technology
Robots To Revolutionize Farming, Ease Labor Woes
2013-07-16
[HOSTED.AP.ORG] Farmers say farm robots could provide relief from recent labor shortages, lessen the unknowns of immigration reform, even reduce costs, increase quality and yield a more consistent product.

"There aren't enough workers to take the available jobs, so the robots can come and alleviate some of that problem," said Ron Yokota, a farming operations manager at Tanimura & Antle, the Salinas-based fresh produce company that owns the field where the Lettuce Bot was being tested.

Many sectors in U.S. agriculture have relied on machines for decades and even the harvesting of fruits and vegetables meant for processing has slowly been mechanized. But nationwide, the vast majority of fresh-market fruit is still harvested by hand.

Research into fresh produce mechanization was dormant for years because of an over-abundance of workers and pressures from farmworker labor unions.

In recent years, as the labor supply has tightened and competition from abroad has increased, growers have sought out machines to reduce labor costs and supplement the nation's unstable agricultural workforce. The federal government, venture capital companies and commodity boards have stepped up with funding.

"We need to increase our efficiency, but nobody wants to work in the fields," said Stavros G. Vougioukas, professor of biological and agricultural engineering at the University of California, Davis.

But farmworker advocates say mechanization would lead to workers losing jobs, growers using more pesticides and the food supply becoming less safe.

"The fundamental question for consumers is who and, now, what do you want picking your food; a machine or a human, who with the proper training and support, can" ... take significant steps to ensure a safer, higher quality product, said Erik Nicholson, national vice president of the United Farm Workers of America.
Posted by:Fred

#21  Silent Running, anyone?
Posted by: Frank G   2013-07-16 21:30  

#20  

I for one welcome our 80s tastic overlords.
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2013-07-16 20:59  

#19  I'm lucky enough to be able to grow my own. I wouldn't mind having robots do all the weeding and tending.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2013-07-16 19:15  

#18  I like the local farmer's market. The tomatoes have taste and the corn I had Sunday was excellent!
Posted by: Bobby   2013-07-16 18:05  

#17  Okay... you win.

+1 interwebs and hold the mayo.
Posted by: Shipman   2013-07-16 17:50  

#16  If the robots become self-aware and begin reproducing, will their US-born children be Metallic Americans and thus eligible for welfare?
Posted by: Dopey Sinatra   2013-07-16 17:32  

#15  
But, won't these robots violate the rights of "undocumented Americans"?


Depends on what you program them to do.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2013-07-16 13:56  

#14  But, won't these robots violate the rights of "undocumented Americans"?
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2013-07-16 12:15  

#13  Increased Gov't farm subsidies and EBT cards should level the playing field on both sides and make everyone happy.....except the poor working stiff and tax payer.
Posted by: Besoeker   2013-07-16 10:15  

#12  But notice the gripe about the infernal machines doing away with farm worker jobs, when one of the incentives toward automation is lack of workers.
Posted by: Fred   2013-07-16 10:10  

#11  They're getting better. I eat the Roma tomatoes even in the summer now. And their consistency makes them good for sandwiches.
Posted by: Fred   2013-07-16 10:07  

#10  But those machine tomatoes suck dead bunnies. :(
Posted by: Shipman   2013-07-16 09:01  

#9  
Those carrots you buy in a bag? Deere and the other ag equipment manufacturers have machines that pull, top, clean and bag them in one process, then spit the bags into a truck driving alongside the harvester.


Tomatoes are also machine-picked, despite their fragility.

Apparently tomato growers once upon a time depended on migrant workers to pick their crops. Then there was a massive strike, and the tomato processors -- Heinz, Campbells, etc -- had nothing to sell. So they cut deals with their growers: we'll front the cost of automation, you pay us back over so many years, no interest, we guarantee to buy from you at market rates.

And so the migrant workers, in their strike, lost their jobs.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2013-07-16 08:36  

#8  Robots are a great idea until one of them chops up a new born fawn with a hay bailer. PETA will throw a fit and the unions will demand a 'look out driver' earning a 'living wage' on all robot tractors.
Posted by: airandee   2013-07-16 08:21  

#7  >In the early 1900's a little less than half of Americans were directly involved in growing/harvesting food and fiber crops or in raising animals. It's now 5% or less depending on how you figure things.

UK it's 1%. Automation doesn't lower the ability of the economy to employ people, it raises it.

Unemployment is caused by taxes on employment (and some rent-seeking).
Posted by: Bright Pebbles   2013-07-16 06:09  

#6  Tractors on large farms now largely do run off of GPS combined with other types of software. They even have tractors which meter whatever soil modifier they apply based upon satellite data over a large field, so that the rate of application is updated constantly and checked with location to apply just the right amount for a particular spot.

Agriculture, at least for large crops like grains, potatoes, cotton, and large-scale veggies like tomatoes for processing and root crops for supermarket distribution etc. have been and will continue to be automated in their production.

Those carrots you buy in a bag? Deere and the other ag equipment manufacturers have machines that pull, top, clean and bag them in one process, then spit the bags into a truck driving alongside the harvester.

Most of supermarket meat is raised the same way, with heavy automation. A lot of the propaganda by animal rights groups about cruelty on these farms is overblown but there is definitely an automated aspect to two of the big three (chicken and pork), less so with beef which does require grass feeding for about a year prior to being grained up. Even milking is automated relative to each cow's, um, spacing, plugged into a machine which automatically adjusts the four milking nozzles and applies them with little human intervention.

Despite questions about some aspects of aquaculture, that too is making inroads in the total amount of fish consumed. Oysters and salmon that Americans consume are now almost entirely farmed. Much of the white fish is either farm-raised catfish or tilapia. Value added fish products like frozens fillets or fish sticks are more often than not caught on large quota-boat operations like the ones seen on "Deadliest Catch", frozen into blocks, and processed (automated) into breaded product, not caught and sold fresh by small operator individually owned boats.

In the early 1900's a little less than half of Americans were directly involved in growing/harvesting food and fiber crops or in raising animals. It's now 5% or less depending on how you figure things. Outside of boutique or specialty crops raised on small family farms for mostly affluent or trendy end users, that is going to continue. Like it or not (and I don't, always), that's how it is. A difference of a few cents in margin can make or break an operation, and for the most used and lucrative products that means volume, and that means automation.
Posted by: no mo uro   2013-07-16 05:29  

#5  Robots of the world, unite!
You have nothing to loose but your batteries!
Posted by: European Conservative   2013-07-16 02:29  

#4  It's my understanding that tractors now practically run themselves already. Look for the first self-driven vehicle to be a tractor in some field somewhere.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2013-07-16 02:10  

#3  I remember telling a farmer 20 years ago that robots would tend to his crops in the not too distant future.

He laughed at me.

I'm surprised the Israelis aren't on to this. It should be right up their street.
Posted by: phil_b   2013-07-16 02:00  

#2  Lest we fergit, IIRC BUGS BUNNY > "One of these days they may invent something that will actually outsmart a Rabbit".

And so it begins ...

lol.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-07-16 01:46  

#1  (Chortle) A new Under class for Democrats to exploit.

I hear Robosexual, now.
Do we really need a Ro Man?
Posted by: Redneck Jim   2013-07-16 01:42  

00:01