You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Afghanistan
Champ considering total US pullout from AFG in 2014
2013-07-09
Posted by:Besoeker

#17  More ...

* MEMRI.ORG > AL-QAEDA TOP PAKISTANI OFFICER USTAD AHMED FAROOQ: WAR UNDERWAY IN [Pakistani] TRIBAL AREA IS THE BATTLE FOR THE WHOLE OF THE INDIAN SUBCONTINENT.

D *** NG IT, DOES INDONESIA + ASEAN + WESTPAC KNOW???

[Lest we fergit, "RED STAR" TURBAN here].

versus

* SAME > [AL-HAYAT = 06/15/13] SENIOR SAUDI JOURNALIST: UNLESS SSAUDI ARABIA CAN ACT IMMEDIATELY TO REMOVE [Syria's] ASSAD FROM POWER, "NIGHTMARE " OF [Regional? TranS-Regional?]"SHIITE CRESCENT" MAY MATERIALIZE.

From Iran to the Mediterranean = now including EGYPT?
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-07-09 23:01  

#16  E.G. STARS-N-STRIPES > AFGHANISTAN:[Post-2014] CIVILIAN LAYOFFS RAISES FEAR OF STRONGER INSURGENCY, i.e. that soon-to-be-layed-off former Us-NATO Aghan civilian workers will end up joining the Hard Boyz due to post-2014 national economic turmoil or chaos.

The above, + any + all prior MSM-Net Artics + Pert Analyses anticipating such is why mainstream Amers should never listen to the DemoLeft + aligned on why the US-Allies should NOT engage in "nation-building", "national rconstruction, or even "imperialism" when it comes to winning or engaging in overseas military conflicts ala "winning hearts-n-minds".
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-07-09 19:48  

#15  Is there anyway we can hand Vlad this monkey and make it look like a happy meal?
Posted by: Shipman   2013-07-09 16:02  

#14  Wreck the infrastructure as you pull out.

You want the 14th century? Here ya go.
Posted by: Muggsey Mussolini   2013-07-09 15:13  

#13  If you're going to nation build

Start with some place where they already had a nation.
Posted by: g(r)omgoru   2013-07-09 15:06  

#12  Dr. White is spot on. If there is anything to be saved [and that can be debated at great length], it is in the North. A counterinsurgency with a lengthy border sanctuary and safe haven, is a disaster waiting to happen. At this point the entire fok'n place isn't worth a single American or Allied life. Not one !
Posted by: Besoeker   2013-07-09 14:18  

#11  Dr. Steve is correct. GWB blew the mission by believing his own "compassionate conservatism" malarky.

If you're going to nation build you have to take over lock, stock and barrel as we did in Japan post WWII. We can't/won't do that anymore so the shampoo approach is the correct one.

Re: 2014 vs. 2013 it is all about the election. If done in 2013 there's a whole year for the situation to go to hell, which it will no matter when we pull out. This way the Demoslobs can say "We pulled out the troops, hooray." while if they pull out in 2013 the 'pubs can run on the smoking ruins that will be there at that time.
Posted by: AlanC   2013-07-09 13:19  

#10  It was a good idea as originally conceived in 2001: gob-smack the Taliban, support the Northern Alliance, and destroy al-Qaeda. We got about 95% of that mission done in less than a year.

Then GWB made a big mistake: he listened to Democrats, Europeans, and academia. He bought the "Pottery Barn" idea and thought that we had broken Afghanistan, so we had to fix it and "support democracy". Thus we embarked on "nation building", conveniently ignoring that in Afghanistan there is no nation to build.

If we no longer buy into this then a return to the 2001 plan is a good one: let the crazy Pashtuns and Paks have their playground in the south, and support the Northern Alliance.

But that won't win votes either.
Posted by: Steve White   2013-07-09 13:06  

#9   IF it's a good idea in 2014 it's a good idea now in 2013

It's like rob said: can't get 2014 mid-term election impact if it's done in 2013.
Posted by: Pappy   2013-07-09 13:00  

#8  Lone Ranger has it right. We are never going to transform Afghanistan into anything positive. Get our men and women outta there ASAP. Every dollar spent and every life lost is a waste.
Posted by: remoteman   2013-07-09 12:58  

#7  C'mon, he pulls out in 2013 and it'll be forgotten by the time the 2014 Congressional elections come around.
Posted by: Rob Crawford   2013-07-09 12:39  

#6  I second TFSM's sentiments. Afghanistan on a good day is in the condition that you threaten to beat your worst opponent into, as a forceful threat.

If Obumble pulls everyone out quickly, it will be the only thing he's ever done as President with which I agree enthusiastically. I have to assume that he and his cronies will think up some way to screw up even that good thing - but I will hope for the best.
Posted by: Lone Ranger   2013-07-09 12:33  

#5  When we pull out I still think we have not dealt with the source of political islam ie Saudi, Pakistan and Iran.
Posted by: Paul D   2013-07-09 12:33  

#4  If Obama thinks it is a good idea then it is probably a very bad one for the Free World.
Posted by: JFM   2013-07-09 12:19  

#3  Can't turn a septic tank into a bottle of Chanel No. 5. Should have gone the glass parking lot route in 2001. Might still have the paks' attention if we'd done that...
Posted by: M. Murcek   2013-07-09 11:58  

#2  It's about time he stop asking people to die in a war he plans to lose.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2013-07-09 11:34  

#1  IF it's a good idea in 2014 it's a good idea now in 2013.
Posted by: Thing From Snowy Mountain   2013-07-09 11:33  

00:00