You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Pentagon Shoots Down Kerry's Syria Airstrike Plan
2013-06-19
Jahwn Kerry: second smartest man in a room when it's him and a chair. Perhaps next time he'll ask his lucky hat...
Twenty years ago, in a debate over the war in Bosnia, Madeleine Albright, then the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, issued a challenge to the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Colin Powell. Albright wanted the U.S. to confront an aggressive Serbia; Powell and the Pentagon were hesitant. Albright grew frustrated: "What's the point of having this superb military that you're always talking about if we can't use it?" Albright asked. Powell later said that he thought Albright was going to give him an aneurysm.

Flash-forward to this past Wednesday. At a principals meeting in the White House situation room, Secretary of State John Kerry began arguing, vociferously, for immediate U.S. airstrikes against airfields under the control of Bashar al-Assad's Syrian regime -- specifically, those fields it has used to launch chemical weapons raids against rebel forces.

It was at this point that the current chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the usually mild-mannered Army General Martin Dempsey, spoke up, loudly. According to several sources, Dempsey threw a series of brushback pitches at Kerry, demanding to know just exactly what the post-strike plan would be and pointing out that the State Department didn't fully grasp the complexity of such an operation.

Dempsey informed Kerry that the Air Force could not simply drop a few bombs, or fire a few missiles, at targets inside Syria: To be safe, the U.S. would have to neutralize Syria's integrated air-defense system, an operation that would require 700 or more sorties. At a time when the U.S. military is exhausted, and when sequestration is ripping into the Pentagon budget, Dempsey is said to have argued that a demand by the State Department for precipitous military action in a murky civil war wasn't welcome.
Posted by:Steve White

#7  More ...

* TOPIX, WORLD NEWS > THE END OF SYRIA AS WE KNOW IT - WHY IS OBAMA DECLARING WAR?

He is???
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-06-19 23:19  

#6  See also DAILY STAR.LB > OBAMA: UNITED STATES NOT READY TO GO TO WAR, proclaiming that it is the intent of his Admin + USA to end the crisis in Syria, + not engage in any new war e.g. AFPAK.

VERSUS

* SAME > OPINION: THE US WAFFLES.

ARTIC > the Bammer Admin = USA has flip-flopped on all its words + promises, IFF THE US DOES WISH TO HELP OR ASSIST THE ANTI-ASSAD SYRIAN REBELS IT SHOULD JUST SAY SO OPENLY OR DIRECTLY.

Stop flipping on a flop of a flup of a flap ..., + vice versa.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2013-06-19 23:05  

#5  Fast boats for the riverine Marine, that's the ticket.
Posted by: AlanC   2013-06-19 16:14  

#4   I guess we could just attack from the jungle, they would never expect that.

I like it! Even this plan will require planning, we're going to need rain, lots of rain and time, I figure if we can get 120 inches/yr and the warming holds in 40 yrs or so we ought to have enough cover to launch our little surprise, they won't know what hit 'em.

Posted by: Shipman   2013-06-19 16:00  

#3  "Lucky Hats and Purple Hearts for everyone!"
Posted by: Frank G   2013-06-19 14:36  

#2  You mean the operation involves more than turning to the news and watching booms? Huh.

btw, does the gud secretariet even know if we have replenished our tomadove peaceful delivery devices? I guess we could just attack from the jungle, they would never expect that.
Posted by: swksvolFF   2013-06-19 12:51  

#1  Jawn (rhymes with yawn) did serve in Viet Nam--a modern day Sun Tzu. Hard to understand why Dempsey didn't think the plant was brilliant.
Posted by: JohnQC   2013-06-19 11:17  

00:00